May #112 : Big, Bad Media Bugout - by Jeff Hoover

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

A Model Activist

Hep Cat

The Brave Lady of Haiti

Mighty Real

Big, Bad Media Bugout

Earthwatch

PEP on the Down Low

Quick Studies

Legal Eye

On the March!

Notes on Camp

Kentucky Fried Bigots?

POZ Picks

Hollywood to HIVers: Drop Dead

Ouch!

Veggie Table

Don't Run

A Peek in the Pipeline

Ducking Resistance

Quick Study

Pharm Team

Warning!

Haartbeats

Editor's Letter

Mailbox

Teen Jeopardy

Heavy Lifting



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

May 2005

Big, Bad Media Bugout

by Jeff Hoover

Why the "supervirus" story may end not with a bang but a whimper

Scary new HIV strain discovered,” blared the February 12 Miami Herald. “Rare strain of HIV resists drugs, builds rapidly into AIDS,” trumpeted the February 14 Wall Street Journal. Only three days after New York City health commissioner Thomas Frieden, MD, made the bombshell February 11 announcement that a local man had been diagnosed with triple-drug-resistant and rapidly progressing HIV, worldwide media outlets took the sensationalist superbug story hostage—each to advance its own agenda.

After Frieden’s televised press conference—which included a public-health alert for medical providers—little additional information about the new patient zero and the consequences of this new strain followed. Was this a public-health crisis or a one-off phenomenon? Ongoing studies of the man’s virus and his sex partners would, at best, slowly yield an answer. But the media onslaught continued.

Syndicated right-wing columnist Cal Thomas conjured the gay men = promiscuity = evil = death formula: “There have been some reports of ‘suicide missions’ by uninfected men who knowingly have sex with HIV positive men, believing that to be infected gives them a certain societal status.” Thomas’ argument was bolstered by patient zero’s irresistible hook—a middle-aged gay man who had reportedly had unprotected sex with hundreds in recent months while using crystal meth.

Within the gay community, author Charles Kaiser wrote in the New York Daily News: “A person who is HIV positive has no more right to unprotected sex with someone else than he has the right to put a bullet through that person’s head.” Nonexperts and experts alike seemingly crawled out of AIDS dormancy to debate the efficacy and longevity of HIV meds and prevention.

Scientists, researchers and activists were quoted arguing whether conclusive evidence supported Frieden’s revelation. HIV codiscoverer Robert Gallo voiced skepticism. Activist Richard Jefferys told the Gay City News that “based on the [press release], to call this a new strain is incorrect.” Right-leaning HIVer Andrew Sullivan noted in his blog that it’s “extremely common for newly infected people to see their CD4 counts plummet in the early stages before their own immune system bounces back.” Others correctly noted that some HIVers receive AIDS diagnoses within a year of infection, though a sizable number also take 10 years or more.

David Ho, MD, director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (ADARC), where the patient was treated and the strain identified, addressed a packed, hastily organized session at the February 24 annual Retrovirus conference in Boston. He and his colleagues fielded oft-hostile questions. “Only additional investigations will reveal whether this is an isolated case,” he said. “Irrespective of the outcome, the public-health implications of this single patient should not be minimized.” At press time, the man’s “untreatable” virus was reportedly responding to combo therapy. No additional superbug cases have arisen.
Was Frieden’s alarm and the media blitzkrieg justified? Pulitzer Prize–winning AIDS journalist Laurie Garrett (The Coming Plague) says yes—even if

SO MANY SUPERS...
POZ broke the first-ever “superbug” story in 1996. That’s why we’ve cast a cold eye on "super" stories ever since.

"SUPERVIRUS" NEWS:
In August/September 1996’s “Attack of the Mutation Monster,” Mike Barr issues the first popular-press report of drug- resistant HIV, caused by AZT monotherapy. Musing darkly, he asks whether a new epidemic of untreatable multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV has been spawned.
FOLLOW-UP:
Resistance soon materializes as a bane of the protease boom, but Barr’s worst-case scenario does not.

"SUPERINFECTION" NEWS:
In May 1997’s “Who’s Afraid of Reinfection?” Mark Schoofs dares to disclose that many gay HIVers are having unprotected sex with one another. Schoofs speculates about the risk of reinfection with a second strain that may cause serious treatment complications.
FOLLOW-UP:
Only a handful of reinfection—a.k.a. “superinfection"—cases have ever been found, though last month Frieden’s own health officials were warning of “many cases.”

“SUPER TRANSMISSION” NEWS: In November 1999’s “Both Sides Now,” HIVer vet Stephen Gendin and his partner, Hush MacDowell, offer first-person accounts of how MacDowell contracted Gendin’s MDR virus—and became the first reported case of resistant-HIV transmission.
FOLLOW-UP: After Dr. David Ho’s ADARC first turned him away, dismissing his MDR transmission fears as unscientific,
MacDowell went on to be tested and successfully treated at the clinic. Today, he remains healthy.

-Walter Armstrong

confusion and panic had ensued. “Denial and silence are the true dangers,” she wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed, adding that the news should spur drug companies to “create new  HIV drugs” to confront future mutant viruses. “We can’t tell our public-health officials we would simply rather not know the bad news about AIDS.”

Indeed, knowing the “bad news” about AIDS—and reinforcing infection fears—may help those most at risk. Yet the unmistakable response to the media hysteria among many gay men remains a puzzled “Is that all there is?” Indifference will become the true deadly contagion if health officials, facing atypical HIV infections, keep crying wolf—that is, unless the supervirus somehow proves worthy of its super PR.  



[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Should the U.S. gay blood ban end?
Yes
No

Survey
Smoke Signals

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.