January #78 : Statistical Significance - by Denny Lee

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Generation Next

2002 For Beginners

The Rainy Season

Ashcroft Goes to Pot

Statistical Significance

China Syndrome

Qatar Players

The Rights Stuff

Suicide Bomb

Con Condoms

Sex Pistols

Say What?

Female Trouble I

Female Trouble II

Newbie Trap

Feds Nix Lipo Fix

Who's Sore-y Now?

E & Thee

Tranny Pan

Dot the Eyes

Life in Wartime

Accidental Czar

Mailbox

Torch Song



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

January 2002

Statistical Significance

by Denny Lee

Read between the lines the next time you see a newspaper article with AIDS stats. Take, say UNAIDS' annual global AIDS report. As the mainstream press dutifully announced early last year, South Africa has more HIV infections (4.7 million) than any other country on the planet.

But Rian Malan, a South African reporter, spent most of 2001 trying to confirm the statistic and came up empty. In a thought-provoking article in the November 22 Rolling Stone, he wrote, "When UNAIDS announces that 14 million Africans have succumbed to AIDS, it does not mean 14 million bodies have been counted. It means that 14 million people have theoretically died." The figures are "extrapolated" -- a weasly word -- from leftover blood samples taken from South African prenatal clinics.

The debate over numbers is not limited to poorer countries. Gay journo Andrew Sullivan has inveighed against the media for effectively reprinting last year's CDC press release that one in three young black gay men has HIV. "Complete reiteration of CDC orthodoxy," he complained in June in The New Republic, "with nary an attempt to subject any of it to the teeniest bit of skepticism or statistical analysis." According to Sullivan, that bombshell may have been based on only one or two infections in a six-city study that included a mere 122 black men with HIV. To arrive at that figure, the CDC had followed the UNAIDS recipe and calculated backward.

No one is impugning UNAIDS or the CDC, but it's not a stretch to spy self-interest in inflating HIV rates. Attention-grabbing numbers mean bigger bucks in aid.

For years, activists have blasted the press for not covering the epidemic aggressively enough. The criticism now, it seems, has shifted from quantity to quality.




[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    charliehunter
    San Francisco
    California


    july8th69
    brooklyn
    New York


    OahuAJ
    Turlock
    California


    donnyp
    liberty
    Kentucky
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.