July #72 : Is That All There Is to Approval?

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues

Table of Contents

Splitting Image

Is That All There Is to Approval?

Combination Strategies

Gimme Shelter

Bells, Books and Candles


Calling All Angels

It's Raining Meds

Demand Results


Parody Killed The Prevention Ad

Genes In The Bunch


Shop Till You Drop

Gyn and Bitters

The Untouchables


All Lit Up

Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle


Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

email print

July 2001

Is That All There Is to Approval?

Folks at the FDA say they know what's wrong with the fine print when they see it. This ad for DuPont's Sustiva (efavirenz) was yanked last year after officials declared that it violated the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act -- enforceable by law -- with numerous "misleading claims." A revamped version was approved after the following corrections were made.

The FDA editors asked DuPont for a rewrite because the ad's main tagline was misleading: It implied that Sustiva "improves survival in patients with HIV infection," which "has not been demonstrated by substantial evidence." That is, the cutie-pie might be celebrating the big 4-0 because of luck, not drug. The new ad traded in so ("in order that" -- Webster's) for because ("for the reason that"), softening the so alliterative Sustiva-sustenance association.

Claims that Sustiva is "superior to protease inhibitor-containing regimens" were rejected because the drug had been compared to "only two of six in head-to-head trials," the FDA wrote. Version No. 2 names indinavir and nelfinavir specifically. Plus, the new copy spells out that Sustiva must be taken with two NRTIs to be effective.

DuPont added info specifying initial bedtime dosing and avoiding high-fat meals. "Failing to provide this context with your 'convenience' claims misleadingly implies that Sustiva can be taken without restrictions," the FDA wrote.

Sustiva's boast of "fewer gastrointestinal side effects" than Viracept was "an unsubstantiated superiority claim" -- diarrhea was more common among Viracept-takers, but rates of nausea and vomiting were about equal. New text: "Sustiva is generally well tolerated, with no long-term toxicities observed."

The ad "lacks fair balance because the risk information is inadequate," the FDA wrote. There was no mention of common side effects -- other than the famed Sustiva nightmares, dizziness and "a few reports of suicide, but Sustiva has not been established as the cause" -- or other meds with the potential for dangerous interactions. The revised version acknowledged "mild or moderate rash" and a number of drugs to avoid while on Sustiva.

[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Did you participate in an event for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day 2016?


more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.