January #131 : The Load Not Taken - by Gus Cairns

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents
 

Labors of Love

The Kids Aren't Alright

With Honors




A Little Something on the Side

Even Combos Get the Blues

The Load Not Taken

HIV Bytes

Don't Get Fresh With Me

Discounted Labels

Thai-ing the Knot

Don't Leave Work Without It

Teen Angel

While You Weren't Sleeping

High Definition




Isn't That Special?

Prison Break

Anywhere but Here

Death and the Maidens

Diplomatic Immunity

Very Adult Education

On the Download

Face for the Cure

Tales From the Crib

Big Med on Campus




Editor's Letter-January 2007

Mailbox-January 2007

Catch of the Month-January 2007



 
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV



email print

January 2007


The Load Not Taken

by Gus Cairns

Viral load may not provide the whole lowdown

Amid all that conflicting treatment info, there’s one old faithful: Viral load (VL) is the best measure of HIV progression. Or is it? It’s certainly the best gauge of whether your HIV meds are working. But a recent study questions whether VL is good for another use: predicting if and when people who are not yet taking meds will need them.

Since 1996, when John Mellors, MD, found that, on average, people with high viral loads get sicker quicker, doctors have used VL in deciding when to start meds. But a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association says viral load may not be the best indicator of when your CD4 count will dive. Tracking 2,800 people with HIV but off treatment, the study “shows that viral load can predict only about 4% to 6% of CD4 [losses],” says study researcher Steven Deeks, MD.

The findings challenge the old analogy of HIV as a train heading for a cliff (AIDS). CD4 count is the distance to the cliff; VL, the train’s speed. Deeks now says those with low VLs may rush cliffward, while others with high VLs may inch along. The difference lies in individual factors. “We need to find out what those are,” he adds.

Others challenge the study. Mellors says, “We’ll publish unequivocal evidence refuting it.” Meanwhile, you and Doc should evaluate all your lab numbers—and your own unique qualities—to decide when to count on a combo.   


[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dambitious
    Gone
    New York


    july8th69
    brooklyn
    New York


    Deelight4u
    BROOKLYN
    New York


    Fergie911
    Chicago
    Illinois
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.