November #76 : Treatment Interruptus - by Richard Jeffreys

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Masters of Disasters

Out of the Chaos, Voices

The Mighty ACT UP Has Fallen: The Philadelphia Story

Hit Me, Baby, One More Time

Final Chapters

Pilgrim's Progress

St. Louis Blues

Obits

Truth and Dare

Dateline Dec. 1

Psst...Get This

Hope Screens Eternal

Hearts & Crafts

Shelf Life

Treatment Interruptus

New Drug Watch: Tenofovir

The Real Female Rubber

Twice Bitten

SAY WHAT?

Curve Ball

Heart Smart?

Darkness at Noon

Stranger in a Strange Land

Editor's Letter

Mailbox

The Face of Terror



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

November 2001

Treatment Interruptus

by Richard Jeffreys

A leading STI researcher gives Rich Jeffreys the scoop on the good (hydroxyurea increases CD4s during drug breaks), the bad (most drug holidayers won't contain viral load) and the experimental (Dermavir, a therapeutic vaccine). The STI score? Promises and limitations in a tie.

Several years ago, Franco Lori, MD, and Julianna Lisziewicz, PhD, codirectors of Georgetown University's Research Institute for Genetic and Human Therapy (RIGHT), stunned colleagues with the case of a 29-year-old Berliner with HIV whose viral load did not rebound when he quit taking HAART. (His virus remains undetectable to this day.) Compelled by the implications of this fact, Lori and Lisziewicz immediately immersed themselves in the matter of how structured treatment interruptions (STIs) might not only spare HIVers some of the toxicity of antiretrovirals but also actually help the immune system fight back against HIV -- and keep the virus suppressed. Their research has also focused on Dermavir, a therapeutic vaccine candidate that may "teach" HIVers' immune systems to mount an anti-HIV response. Richard Jefferys recently talked with Lisziewicz about RIGHT's new buzz and the promise it holds for treatment.


Give us an update on what you've presented recently.

At the International AIDS Society conference last July, we reported the results of our STI study in which patients did three weeks on and three weeks off meds for six months. We compared two regimens -- hydroxyurea (Hydrea, or HU), ddI (Videx), and d4T (Zerit) vs. indinavir (Crixivan), ddI and d4T. Patients' viral loads rebounded during every interruption, but when therapy was restarted, the virus was always inhibited again. One thing we observed, though, is very important: During the STI, the rebound rate using HU or Crixivan was basically the same, but in the Crixivan group, the CD4 count bounced up and down similar to the viral load, while in the HU group, we saw a constant increase of CD4 count with no oscillation. This was very surprising because without an STI, HU does not increase CD4s.

Did you see changes in HIV-specific immune responses?

We're analyzing that data now. So far, it looks like a treatment interruption that actually induces a new "set point" [suppresses viral load level to a sustained new low] may work only in patients treated early in infection -- and especially before complete seroconversion. And based on Bruce Walker's and other data coming out, we cannot even say that every single person treated before seroconversion will be able to stop therapy and control viral load. Unfortunately, we can say that most of the patients starting later than this very narrow window -- and that's the vast majority -- probably will not be able to control viral load when we only do an STI but don't induce immune responses in some other kind of way.

Is there still a role for plain STIs, which cut down therapy time to reduce toxicity and cost, and to give patients a break?

Yes, definitely. Mark Dybul, with Anthony Fauci's group, is trying a one week on, one week off STI schedule in which he's showing that viral load is not rebounding and toxicity is decreased. So I think it is still very encouraging that we can do STIs and the patients are not only not harmed but also they are still controlling the viral load rebound when they go back on HAART. Of course, the STI has to be very carefully administered in order to avoid a very high viral load rebound, which then might harm the immune system. But a small viral load rebound may be more tolerable than a lot of toxicity.

What's up with your studies of the experimental therapeutic vaccine Dermavir?

We designed Dermavir after we saw that the Berlin Patient only had T cell-mediated immune responses but no antibody responses at all. We asked ourselves how we could induce such T cell-mediated responses in other patients. Can we put DNA, the genetic code that makes mimics of HIV proteins, into dendritic cells (DC) -- the cells that present pieces of virus to T cells in order to kick-start the immune response? Can these DCs then go to the lymph nodes, express the genes, and induce a T cell-mediated immune response? We have encouraging data from animal studies and hope to start human trials soon. We're putting all of our energy into this -- we just can't sleep on it when patients might benefit.




[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dambitious
    Gone
    New York


    Loveladyd
    Washington
    DC


    youngbloodlatino
    Columbia
    Maryland


    pozsmith1
    East Bay
    California
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Are you a regular coffee drinker?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.