March #57 : Big Bro - by Shana Naomi Krochmal

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Woman on the Verge

The River Runs Through It

The Jelly Revolution

Let's Dance

Publisher's Letter

Mailbox

Catching Up With...

Call The Cops

Say What?

Big Bro

Chew the Stat

NEG/POS

Trade Route To Riot

Bookmark This

Nana’s Natural Remedy

Underground Railroad

Milestones

The Body Politic

High Crimes

Low Blows

Trip The Light Magnificent

Relatively Speaking

A Tricky Combination

Beat The Blues

Down But Not Out

Comfort Zone

Tendergroin District

The Matrix

Beyond Eradication

Herb Of The Month

ddIDay

3.29.89: Fine Toon



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

March 2000

Big Bro

by Shana Naomi Krochmal

The CDC blindsided many in the AIDS community with its December release of new recommendations requiring all states to report the names of people who test HIV positive—or risk losing federal funds. After 18 years, the agency says it needs hard numbers, not estimates, to track infections.

In fact, 35 states already use names-based reporting.  Four others employ unique identifiers, a coding system widely backed by names critics because it counts each case of HIV while safeguarding anonymity. And even the CDC allows that if its regs are adopted nationwide, its surveillance data will remain sketchy—limited to the two-thirds of all HIVers who are diagnosed in a doctor’s office or other confidential testing sites. (The one-third diagnosed through anonymous testing centers or at home with kits will still go untracked.) To counter critics’ longstanding argument that fears of exposure and discrimination deter would-be testers, the CDC cited a 1999 study by the University of California that found no significant effect.

Activists also worry that the CDC’s regs will be legislated into this year’s reauthorization of the Ryan White CARE Act. With major AIDS organizations dependent on that money, getting them to give up funding rather than give out names may be the hardest sell of all.  



[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dlw8585
    Fort Lauderdale
    Florida


    koffeeboss
    Tucson
    Arizona


    Sexynyrican
    Brooklyn
    New York


    daino1972
    Columbus
    Ohio
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Is HIV/AIDS adequately portrayed in pop culture?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.