Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Women's Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » Treatment News


 

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

emailrssprint

July 11, 2007

HIV Treatment Boosts Birth Rate
(Reuters Health)

by Martha Kerr

Compared with the live birth rate in HIV-infected women before the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the rate in the HAART era has increased 150%, investigators with the Women's Interagency HIV Study report in the June issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The initial study enrollment occurred in 1994-1995, during the pre-HAART era. A second enrollment occurred between 2001 and 2002, during the HAART era.

There were 569 HIV-negative women and 2,012 HIV-positive women enrolled in the first phase of the study, and 405 HIV-negative women and 476 HIV-positive women enrolled during the HAART era. Mean age of the first group was 29 years and mean age of the second group was 33 years.

The live birth rate in the pre-HAART era ranged from 42.4 per 1,000 person-years for women with CD4 cell counts at enrollment below 200, to 70.2 per 1,000 person-years for women with CD4 cell counts above 350.

The live birth rate in the HAART era was 198.5 per 1000 person-years for women with CD4 cell counts below 200, and 142.6 per 1,000 person-years for women with CD4 cell counts above 350.

"We found that live birth rates for women not infected with HIV have remained relatively constant," at 101.6 to 106.7 live births per 1,000 person-years, lead investigator Dr. Anjali Sharma of the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn commented in an interview with Reuters Health.

"It is difficult to definitively determine the reasons for this increase in live birth rate seen" in the post-HAART era, Dr. Sharma continued. "It may be due to better health of the mother, which leads to improved fertility."

"Or perhaps women's knowledge of available treatments to prevent HIV infection of the fetus makes carrying a pregnancy to term an option chosen more often, as those women receiving successful HAART regimen are unlikely to transmit HIV to the fetus," the investigator surmised, noting that a vertical HIV transmission rate as low as 1%-2% is now achievable.

"Additionally, better overall life expectancy for the mother may be a key factor," Dr. Sharma added, "as women with HIV can expect to live to care for their children in the HAART era."

Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:541.e1-541.e6.



Copyright© 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

emailrssprint


[Go to top]


Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Blogs by HIV+ Women
Regan Ann Michelle Annette

Read the blogs
Woman of the Month
Beth Benne: Nursing HIV Awareness
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California. 


Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I recently met a guy who is negative. I did tell him about my status and he decided to kiss me anyway (we didn't go further than that). But a day later, he called and said that he actually had a mouth ulcer that time when we kissed and he was very worried. Asked if he can get the virus from me that way. For that moment, I felt so insulted and yet I felt so bad. It was my first time having a contact with a "negative" guy."

from Positive Women


Join the forums

Smart + Strong Network
POZ Magazine
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health Magazine
TuSalud Magazine
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
Also visit POZ on...
Facebook

MySpace

YouTube

 
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy