Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Women's Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » Treatment News


 

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

emailrssprint

August 1, 2007

Lexiva vs. Reyataz: Comparable Efficacy

by Tim Horn

New data from a study comparing Lexiva (fosamprenavir) to Reyataz (atazanavir), both combined with Norvir (ritonavir), indicates that these top-choice protease inhibitor (PI) options for HIV-positive patients beginning therapy for the first time are similar in their effectiveness. The 48-week results, along with a second study reported at the fourth IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention (IAS 2007) in Sydney, also suggest that the Norvir dose currently used to boost Lexiva levels in the bloodstream can be halved without compromising the drug combination’s effectiveness.

PIs combined with low-dose Norvir have become increasingly popular treatment options. This is based on a litany of research conducted over the past several years indicating that Norvir boosting can help maximize effectiveness and ease dosing. Kaletra, containing lopinavir and Norvir, is already a widely prescribed boosted PI; given the accumulation of positive data from ongoing studies, regimens containing Norvir-boosted Lexiva or Reyataz are gaining in popularity as well. 

The ALERT study, reviewed at IAS 2007 by Keith Pappa, MD, of GlaxoSmithKline, enrolled 106 HIV-positive people starting HIV treatment for the first time. Patients were randomized to receive Reyataz (300 mg) plus Norvir (100 mg) once daily or Lexiva (700 mg) plus an experimental, lower-than-usual dose of Norvir (100 mg, instead of the recommended 200 mg) once daily. All patients also received standard doses of once-daily Truvada (tenofovir plus emtricitabine).

Upon entering the study, the 106 HIV-positive patients enrolled had average viral loads of 80,000 copies and CD4 counts of 190 cells.

After 48 weeks of treatment, 75 percent of those in the Lexiva group had viral loads below 50 copies; in the Reyataz group, approximately 83 percent had viral loads below 50. The difference between the two groups wasn't statistically significant, meaning that it could have been due to chance.

CD4 count improvements were also similar in both groups. There was a gain of 170 CD4 cells in the Lexiva group, compared to 183 cells in the Reyataz group.

As for side effects, moderate cholesterol level increases, including “bad” LDL and “good” HDL, were documented in both groups. The only statistically significant difference involved triglyceride levels, which increased by an average of 34 mg/dL in the Lexiva group, compared to an average increase of only 7 mg/dL in the Reyataz group.

The most notable side-effect difference between the two groups was an increase in bilirubin levels (which can cause otherwise harmless yellowing of the eyes, skin and nails), which occurred in 30 percent of patients taking Reyataz compared to no one in the Lexiva group.

Rates of diarrhea, while relatively rare in both groups, were twice as common among those in the Lexiva group (8 percent vs. 4 percent).

Also of note are data from a second study exploring key differences between the 100 mg and 200 mg Lexiva-boosting dose of Norvir. Among the 115 patients starting therapy for the first time—they received Lexiva, one of the two Norvir doses, plus Epzicom (abacavir plus lamivudine)—84 percent of the patients in the 100 mg group had viral loads below 400 copies after 48 weeks, compared to 67 percent of patients in the 200 mg group. This difference was statistically significant.

According to Duke University’s Charles Hicks, MD, who presented the dose comparison at IAS 2007, clinically meaningful—greater than 20 percent—declines in arm and leg fat (a possible sign of lipoatrophy) and increases in trunk fat (a possible sign of lipohypertrophy) occurred in both groups of patients. While he report that these more pronounced changes occurred less frequently in patients receiving the 100 mg Norvir booster once a day, compared to those in the 200 mg group, the differences were not statistically significant.

Changes in cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar between the two groups.

Dr. Hicks pointed out that the 100 mg boosting dose of Norvir, while not yet approved, is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Sources:

Smith K, Weinberg W, DeJesus E, et al. Once-daily ritonavir (100 mg) boosting of fosamprenavir (FPV/r) or atazanavir (ATZ/r) with tenofovir (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients: 48-week safet/efficacy results from COL103952 (ALERT) [Abstract WEPEB023]. Fourth IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, Sydney, 2007.

Wohl D, Lancaster T, DeJesus E, et al. Determination of body composition changes by total body DEXA after 48 weeks of treatment with once-daily fosamprenavir (FPV) boosted with two different doses of ritonavir(r) plus abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine(3TC): COL100758 [Abstract TUPEB080]. Fourth IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, Sydney, 2007.

emailrssprint


[Go to top]


Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Blogs by HIV+ Women
Regan Ann Michelle Annette

Read the blogs
Woman of the Month
Beth Benne: Nursing HIV Awareness
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California. 


Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I recently met a guy who is negative. I did tell him about my status and he decided to kiss me anyway (we didn't go further than that). But a day later, he called and said that he actually had a mouth ulcer that time when we kissed and he was very worried. Asked if he can get the virus from me that way. For that moment, I felt so insulted and yet I felt so bad. It was my first time having a contact with a "negative" guy."

from Positive Women


Join the forums

Smart + Strong Network
POZ Magazine
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health Magazine
TuSalud Magazine
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
Also visit POZ on...
Facebook

MySpace

YouTube

 
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy