July #49 : Rubber Suit - by Scott Hess

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

The Power of One

The Power of One: Senegal

The Power of One: Uganda

The Power of One: Zimbabwe

The Power of One: Zambia

World Weary

South Africa's Moment of Truth

Back to the Roots

Chain Reactions: Medicine Woman

Chain Reactions: Poetic Justice

Chain Reactions: Ray of Hope

Chain Reactions: Reluctant Witness

Guest Editor's Letter

To the Editor

Bath Sides Now

Walk the Talk

Rubber Suit

Memo Demo

Dread Locked

PWAs vs. Y2K

Jail Break

Say What

Gender Agenda

Simon Nkoli

Obits

POZarazzi: Spring Sprung

License to Kill

Keep HOPE Alive

POZ Picks

Show & Tell

The Holistic Truth

Get Over It

Sugar on Top

Cheer to Adhere

Gene Pool

Cream Puff

The Protease Prison

Out in Africa

Where to Find It

Grandma’s Recipe

Grace Under Pressure



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

July 1999

Rubber Suit

by Scott Hess

Pouch patent causes friction

HIV preventionists aren’t the only ones griping about rumored drops in condom use: Manufacturers are also scrambling for ways to stay in the loop. The resulting rubber renaissance has produced creative “solutions” to such common condom blunders as wrong-way applicaton: Durex’s new Gold Coin can be rolled on inside or out, for instance, and Ansell offers “butter-pat packaging” for easy access.

But the biggest, er, rub—that rubbers blunt penile sensation—has resulted in some sticky competition. This spring, two condom companies butted heads in a New Jersey patent dispute. Portfolio Technologies, owner of the Pleasure Plus condom, sought a temporary injunction against Alla Reddy, MD, claiming that his Inspiral condom, with a baggy top bulge (see photo) was identical to its product.

Both models are brainchilds of rubber-maker Reddy, 59, who has developed a cult following for exploiting the friction of moving latex. His Pleasure Plus creation sold wildly until a manufacturing problem yanked it off the shelf in the early ’90s, causing Reddy to lose his financial pants and sell the rights to Portfolio, which started shipping its “new-and-improved” Plus in May.

Reddy’s marketing maven, Brian Osterberg, protests the pouch parallel. “The Plus has a goiter-like bulge, and the Inspiral is shaped more like a soft ice-cream cone,” he said. “The claim of infringement is frivolous. The other side is just hoping to save its skin.”

At $1 a pop, the Inspiral was ready to ship to Eckerd and Genovese pharmacies and Planned Parenthood when the injunction put on the brakes. Rubber retailer Condomania reports piles of pre-orders. An appeal is expected either way the rubber bounces.




[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    CuteBoyinQns
    Jackson Heights
    New York


    Loveladyd
    Washington
    DC


    max38man
    Chicago
    Illinois


    donnyp
    liberty
    Kentucky
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.