October #52 : The End of an Epidemic? - by Shana Naomi Krochmal

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues

Table of Contents

Love Me Gender

21st Century Vax

How to get There From There

Fear of a Vax Planet


Letters to the Editor October 1999

The End of an Epidemic?

General Delivery

Veep Show

Black Is...Black Ain't

Memo for the Millennium

Addicted to Life

The Club Scene

Get Over It

Nuking it Out

Babes Out of the Woods

A Vicious Cycle

First Things First

On the Cutting Edge

Great White Hope

Northern Light

I Sing The Body Electric

Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle


Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

email print

October 1999

The End of an Epidemic?

by Shana Naomi Krochmal

Second wave doesn't hold water, says sex survey

Results of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) Sexual Health Survey— with more than 7,000 respondents, New York City’s largest ever—offer strong evidence that the much-debated “second wave” of infections is more fear than fact. In contrast to mid-’80s estimates that one half of the city’s gay men have HIV, GMHC put the current figure at 13 percent, or one in seven. Reflecting similar reports from other cities, this suggests that HIV will continue as an endemic, rather than epidemic, condition among the nation’s urban gay men.

The first survey of its size to focus on incidence of risk reduction (like pulling out before ejaculation) rather than risk elimination (“a condom every time”), the study found such “negotiated safety” to be a routine practice, despite scant support from prevention programs. While experts generally agree that risk reduction is the trend, some aren’t cheering. “We shouldn’t settle for the lowest common denominator,” said Brian Byrnes of Boston’s AIDS Action Committee. “We should support these decisions but continue to encourage condom use.”

While The New York Times’ front-page coverage echoed GMHC’s own risk-reduction views, the city’s tabloids spun the data differently: 39 percent of men surveyed reported unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous year. (This sensational angle dropped the study’s distinction between unsafe sex—no condom between serodiscordant partners—and unprotected sex—no condom between same-status partners.) Eleven percent reported UAI with some-one of a different or unknown HIV status; 10 percent said they’d had UAI but didn’t specify partner status. While GMHC attributed this oversight to the self-administered survey, it’s possible that many men skipped the question to avoid a “taboo” answer, Byrnes said.
Also noteworthy was the finding that only 2 percent of positive men had engaged in serodiscordant UAI. An all-volunteer initiative of GMHC’s B2K program, the report is the first of a multiyear study for the embattled and downsizing ASO.

[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Did you participate in an event for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day 2016?


more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.