February #20 : S.O.S. - by Sean Strub

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

1996 POZ Honors

He Is What He Is

AIDS-Involved Drama Syndrome

Trick Questions

Prisoners In Desire

The Morning After

Blaring Saddles

Father Figures In

Off With Her Wig

On His Toes

The Accidental Advocate

The Eyes Have It

Take a Bow

Take Honey West Home

Hit Bottom

Bone of Contention

Harlot's Web

Robert Wolley

Roamin' Holiday

Godiva Is Love

Dangerous Dining

The Way We War

Champ Change

It's Leasure Time

GayLynn Brummett

S.O.S.

Eureka! Urethra!

Rush Hour



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

February 1997

S.O.S.

by Sean Strub

Celebrity participation in fundraising should not equal unbridled indulgence of ego

The excerpt from Michael Anketell's Tarnished Sequins and Rodger McFarlane's introductory essay, "Stars, Studs & Events" (November 1996), which highlighted the unsavory truth behind AIDS Project Los Angeles' 1993 Friends of Fashion event honoring Calvin Klein, generated more response than any other article ever published in POZ.

One unfavorable response that gave us pause was from entertainment mogul David Geffen. Geffen's primary concern was not about the facts presented in the excerpt, nor about how he was portrayed. He was troubled by the possibility that exposés of this type will discourage celebrities from contributing their time and talent to AIDS benefits. He felt that, by publishing Anketell's excerpt, we imperil the success of future AIDS benefits.

Geffen, who is both a major donor and responsible for the participation of many celebrities in AIDS benefits, knows his Hollywood. And, for some celebrities, he is certainly correct.

But to the many, many celebrities who have repeatedly contributed selflessly of their time, talent and money, Geffen's perspective is an unintended insult. In the experience of those of us at POZ, most celebrities check their egos and self-interest at the door when they get involved in AIDS.

Celebrity participation should not equal unbridled indulgence of ego. Celebrity participation is not usually -- and should not ever be -- a strategy for advancing the financial self-interest of the celebrity. We are better off without those whose interests pervert the purpose of the event, or require what the Calvin Klein organization demanded for its involvement.

In the fashion and style industries, image is everything; it is the prime asset. Of course it should be a consideration in deciding how to produce an event maximizing celebrity participation; the question raised by Anketell's experience is about the appropriate boundaries.

To what extent are these benefits designed to advance an image rather than to fight AIDS? To what extent do we sacrifice integrity to the interests of those being "honored"?

Charitable fundraising that cannot stand the light of day needs to be examined. Virtually all types of fundraising are costly. Rather than cloak these activities in secrecy, the better approach is one of openness and accountability, using the reaction of the giving public as an important guide to acceptable parameters.

Sadly, a once-valuable relationship between AIDS Project Los Angeles (APLA) and Anketell, a former APLA volunteer, board member and consultant, has deteriorated to the point where APLA is making claims of financial misconduct against Anketell, prompting him to threaten suit for slander.

But ultimately, people with HIV will benefit from this discussion. Anketell's honesty puts event producers, celebrities and AIDS organizations on notice that there are limits. Celebrities who exploit AIDS organizations and people with HIV for their own self-interest risk exposure and condemnation.

The light of public scrutiny may not purify the soul, but it is a powerful disinfectant.




[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dhsd777
    san diego
    California


    soy_Ric
    Rochester
    New York


    Fred9774
    Brooklyn
    New York


    Fergie911
    Chicago
    Illinois
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.