June #24 : Skin Traders - by Erik Meers

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Nowhere Else to Go

Great Escapes

Gotta Light?

The Great Sex Debate

Made in Japan

Clipped Wings

The Vinyl Solution

Into the Woods

Hazel's House

Open Windows

S.O.S.-June 1997

Mailbox-June 1997

Ad Lip

A Higher Standard

Just Not Like a Prayer

Who's Sore-y Now?

Say What-June 1997

Devil to Pay

Web of Cries

On Pins and Needles

Fatal Attraction

Cocktails for Kids

To B or Not to B

Pot Doc Stalked

Obituaries

Alexander the Great(ish)

POZ Picks-June 1997

Skin Traders

Absolutely Fabregas

Barbarians at the Gates

Borders on Madness

A Second Look

Painful Truths

Before the Revolution

Riding Bareback

The Fleecing of Oprah

Barrier Blues

Mixed and Matched

To Tell the Truth

The Borders of Health

Road Trip Grub Tips

Following Your HAART

TLC for Your Largest Organ

Art and Soul

Farewells



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

June 1997

Skin Traders

by Erik Meers

Hustlers are chic once more as sex makes a comeback at the movies. But where's AIDS?

“What has replaced promiscuity is the idea of promiscuity,” wrote the gay, infamously controversial HIV positive essayist Andrew Sullivan in his post-apocalyptic paean, “The End of AIDS,” in The New York Times Magazine last winter. I found this the most provocative statement in his wide-ranging piece. While I’m not sure his theory that people are growing less concerned about having HIV stands up in the real world, I do think the idea of promiscuity has been rehabilitated and deemed fit for popular culture again—especially in gay-themed movies. Nothing illustrates this theory as emphatically as the recent release of two films about male prostitutes: johns and Hustler White.

It’s no secret that audiences love transgressiveness. In America, where sex is more taboo than violence, prostitutes are the most transgressive figures of all. Almost 20 years ago, Hollywood grappled intriguingly with the sex trade in such films as American Gigolo and Midnight Cowboy. Perhaps the most beloved hustler is the pansexual Joe Dallesandro in the no-budget ‘70s Andy Warhol films, Flesh and Trash. But in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s, as hopelessness spawned by AIDS seeped into mainstream culture, sexual excesses in Hollywood movies became increasingly rare. Tinseltown shied away from risky sexual topics, producing virtually nothing about AIDS. It also defanged the sex trade: Richard Gere’s sexy hustler in American Gigolo became a preening yuppie out to make an honest woman of Julia Roberts’ lily-white prostie in 1990’s anemic Pretty Woman.

But as Sullivan and others have documented of late, the pall of doom that AIDS cast over sex for the last decade is slowly lifting. Independent and niche-market films have picked up where Hollywood left off. Last year, the gritty Leaving Las Vegas dealt brutally with the struggles of a young sex worker, played by Elizabeth Shue. This year, johns and Hustler White are perhaps the first, though admittedly faint, signs that gay-market movies may again start to explore the sexual netherworld.

What is so remarkable about these movies is not what they show—it’s what they don’t. Both lack any consideration of AIDS. In johns, virtually the only reference to the epidemic is a fleeting shot of leading man David Arquette preparing to go down on his client, condom in mouth. Bruce La Bruce’s Hustler White, a more tongue-in-cheek effort, shows more about how to have sex with an amputee than how to have safer sex.

While indies needn’t cater to mass audiences, they too are driven by market forces and may be subject to a degree of self-censorship.  In making prurient movies such as johns and Hustler White, filmmakers may consciously or unconsciously decide to not raise the unpleasant specter of AIDS and explore the sometimes discomforting mechanics of gay sex—despite its obvious relevance--in a bid to attract an audience beyond gay men. johns’ heterosexual writer/director Scott Silver confirmed this: “I didn’t want to preach to the converted. I didn’t want to have a lot of graphic sex. I wanted it be a movie that straight audiences would be comfortable seeing.” Silver, who interviewed scores of hustlers while penning the film, admits that AIDS is an everyday concern for sex workers. “Most of the gay hustlers who weren’t drug addicts always used condoms. [When I asked about it], they looked at me like I was crazy to suggest that they’d be so stupid [not to]…It’s something they’re aware of but don’t talk about all the time.” Yet, Silver didn’t want the disease to become the focus of his film. “This movie is not about AIDS. It is about the relation between two characters. I wanted it t be responsible but not be about safe sex.”

So what defines a responsible film? While the recently released niche movie Booty Call turned a late-night condom search into a humorous subject, it’s hard to imagine a safer-sex genre. We should make sure the lessons of the last 15 years aren’t lost. If indies fail to integrate safe sex responsibly into scripts, they are no better than their Hollywood foils. Such touches needn’t be heavy-handed but should be included in even the most escapist fare. Two years of treatment progress doesn’t undo 15 of decimation.



[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    charliehunter
    San Francisco
    California


    newlife202
    JOLIET
    Illinois


    OahuAJ
    Glendora
    California


    humboman
    Baltimore
    Maryland
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Is HIV/AIDS adequately portrayed in pop culture?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.