June / July #8 : ADA Upheld

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Down for the Count

Second Wave, Second Thoughts

AIDS' Next Frontier

Role Model

Banker's Hours

Pedigree Activism

Sex Positive

Hey! Watch the Teeth

A Boy and His Toy

Kitten Does Disability

Take Your Best Shot

ADA Upheld

Don't Regulate My Body

Those Darned Kids

Curb Your Dogma

S.O.S.

AIDS Sweeps Week

White Line Fever

Hot for Teacher

Diet and Exercise

New Test for HIV Itself



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

June / July 1995

ADA Upheld

Federal court rules against dentist

Louisiana: In the Justice Department's first case filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a federal court ruled that Dr. Drew Morvant, a Louisiana dentist, could not refuse to treat patients with HIV. Morvant's office reportedly refused to treat two men, who were told that the office did not treat people with HIV.

Maryland: A Maryland court has ruled that a physician with HIV had an affirmative duty to inform patients of his HIV status. The estate of a Maryland oncologist specializing in breast cancer and his hospital, are being sued by two women who underwent surgery by the doctor and learned of his HIV status a month after the doctor died of AIDS. Though HIV negative, the patients filed suit for negligence, failure to obtain informed consent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court ruled the AIDSphobia claim could go forward but only to the extent that the distress can be proven and only for the period of time from when the patients learned of the doctor's illness to the time they learned that they were HIV negative.

New York: The raging legislative debate over whether mothers should be made aware of the results of their newborn babies' HIV antibody tests -- tests which are currently required but handled anonymously in New York -- was stepped-up recently when it moved into the courts. The Association to Benefit Children, a New York City advocacy group for children, filed suit to force the state to inform the mothers of the results. The debate pits the desire to identify newborns with HIV in order to provide HIV treatment and prolong their lives against their mothers' right to privacy. A newborn's positive test result indicates that the mother is also HIV positive.




[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV 101
HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ TV
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Women
African American
Latino
Providers
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    chipper52
    Palm Springs
    California


    romanticseattle
    Tacoma
    Washington


    Deelight4u
    BROOKLYN
    New York


    robert12
    Queens
    New York
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Do you enjoy books with HIV-positive characters?
Yes
No

Survey
Mind Matters

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.