August / September #3 : Face-Off: Access Should Be Our Primary Concern - by Martin Delaney

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents

Pedro Leaves Us Breathless

The POZ 50, Part 1

The POZ 50, Part 2

S.O.S.

Blue Plate Bigotry

What Lies Below

Bob?!

DAS Boot?

A Curly Frost

True Grits

Matchmaker

AIDS Law

Tumbling Run

When Did Steroids Become Our Friend?

The River's Edge

The FDA’s Dirty Little War

Overheard

POZ VCR: Deaf Heaven

Read This

Hey, Listen!

In the Key of Life

Antonio López's Illustrated Legacy

The Shadow Knows

Bruce Mailman, 55

POZ Art

David's Story

Face-Off: Access Should Be Our Primary Concern

Face-Off: Easy Access to Testing is Not Enough

POZ Stats: Home Access HIV Testing

Going Home: Tom Viola



Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

August / September 1994

Face-Off: Access Should Be Our Primary Concern

by Martin Delaney

People are not using current testing options

The discussion of home HIV antibody testing is not a debate about whether testing should be accompanied by counseling. Of course it should, and the home testing process being proposed includes a mandatory, competent and highly consistent counseling mechanism. Nor is it a debate about the quality of testing currently being made available to people in a variety of settings. Most such testing services already do a fine job. There are two principal questions here: (1) whether most people are actually using the existing text counseling services, and (2) whether there is anything wrong with people having an additional personal option about how to access testing and counseling.

The CDC reports that the majority of Americans being tested (56 percent) received no pretest counseling, while 68 percent reported no posttest counseling. This is a disaster. Moreover, 17 percent report that they are already receiving their test results by phone, while 14 percent are receiving them by mail -- ostensibly with little or no counseling. There is a great deal of room for improvement. There is no question that many community service organizations provide excellent testing and counseling services, and they will continue to do so, unhindered by access to any new options. But for most people this is simply not the vehicle of choice for getting tested. For whatever reasons, a great percentage of the population is simply getting blood drawn by physicians, which guarantees nothing in the way of counseling or follow-up services. The hope of a well-designed home-testing service is to provide an option of simplified, confidential testing which incorporates a professional and consistent counseling process, as well as a referral to additional resources and support services.

For some people having a face-to-face encounter with a stranger is simply not an attractive option for talking about HIV testing and counseling. There are many people who are far more comfortable discussing sensitive matters by phone. Examples of this phenomenon include the popularity of radio talk shows, AIDS hotlines, phone sex and crisis counseling -- all of which have been found to be very attractive for many people. Many AIDS hotlines not designed for test counseling are already supporting a great number of recently tested people, simply because callers find it easier to talk about the issues by phone. People are just different, and we should respect their diversity. For some, a well-designed home testing and phone counseling program will be a welcome option which will make it easier to get tested and easier to talk about it.

It's true that home testing cannot solve all problems. There are conceivavle, if remote, ways to abuse such a program, but this is a problem which can be solved, not an insurmountable obstacle. Also home testing and phone counseling cannot guarantee that high risk people will get ongoing risk reduction messages. But there is no such guarantee with face-to-face counseling either. And, as the CDC data shows, most people are already opting out of the loop of on-going counseling.

We should not be in the business of trying to tell people how to get tested. We should be creating options and alternatives which are sufficiently attractive and which meet personal preferences in order to increase the opportunity for testing. Rather than attack a new approach such as home testing, we should put our energies into making sure that the programs that are approved are the best programs of their type, offering the most professional and consistent counseling messages possible. Beyond that, this becomes a matter of personal choice. Not everyone wants or needs government to tell them how to run their lives, whether the question is sexual behavior or HIV antibody testing.

Click here to read the companion article, "Face-Off: Easy Access to Testing is Not Enough".

Scroll down to comment on this story.





Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dhsd777
    san diego
    California


    july8th69
    brooklyn
    New York


    ernienyc
    Bronx
    New York


    jacob2608
    Panama City Beach
    Florida
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Have you ever been tested for hepatitis C?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.