POZ Exclusives : Sean Strub: What's Wrong With Our Movement

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » POZ Exclusives » December 2005

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Web Exclusives

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

December 5, 2005

Sean Strub: What's Wrong With Our Movement

But let’s be frank. We are also to blame. It is not all George Bush’s fault. We have allowed our AIDS service organizations and our community leadership to become politically neutered and institutionalized to the point where the voice of people with HIV has often become absent, or relegated to tokenism.

We have disempowered ourselves by retreating from one of the most important Denver Principles. 

The one calling on our  organizations to include people with HIV in all levels of decision-making, and I quote, “specifically to serve on the boards of directors” of those organizations.

The culture of these boards has changed dramatically since they were first founded. Originally, they were comprised almost entirely of people who were sick or those who thought they might be. When the HIV antibody test arrived, it forever divided the gay male world between those who were positive and those who were negative. 

But we also lost the unifying uncertainty of fear and, over time, the presence of people with HIV on these boards has lessened and lessened. I’m not saying fear is our savior. But unity is, and the Denver Principles can help us regain it.

AIDS has become a huge industry that has made careers, fame and fortune for many.   But the rush over the corpses and voices of people with HIV in the pursuit of power, institutionalization and fundraising has been disgraceful. Part of the reason is because of the lessened presence on these boards by people who were fighting for their own lives.

We did some research at POZ last week to see how people with HIV were represented on the boards of major AIDS organizations today. What we found is disturbing:

GMHC: Out of 13 board members, 2 are positive.
God’s Love: 26/1
APLA: 20/1
Chicago AIDS Foundation 40/2
Whitman-Walker 42/4
SF AIDS Foundation 16/6
Amfar: 25/1
 
And even of these few positive people on these boards, it should be noted that they are all chosen by HIV negative majorities and, in many cases, the people with HIV chosen to serve on boards are also employees of other AIDS-related agencies, both factors which can sometimes cloud or compromise priorities.

These groups were founded to confront and challenge a status quo that was killing us.  It still is, but the organizations we created to lead that charge have abdicated their responsibility to confront it.  What’s more, they have cast us out—us people with HIV—from their board rooms and that has been costly indeed.

As HIV positive representation on these boards declined, ASOs began to "tone it down" to qualify for as much money as they could grab from government sources. Advocacy has taken a back seat.  Prevention programs with integrity and results became secondary to those that could get funded.   Complicated and controversial, but important, issues--like fighting criminalization—have been abandoned.

AIDS service organizations have forgotten that part of their service they were founded to provide, perhaps one of the most important services they can provide today, is advocacy, activism and leadership in the communities where the epidemic is hitting hardest

The philosophy behind the Denver Principles pioneered an extraordinary model of partnership between the agencies and the communities they serve.  But from a pioneering model of partnership, many agencies are now reverting to the Denver Principles’ dreaded “victim” model.  

Is that what we want?  

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    adoniz89
    san dimas
    California


    Loveladyd
    Washington
    DC


    Fred9774
    Brooklyn
    New York


    humboman
    Baltimore
    Maryland
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Is HIV/AIDS adequately portrayed in pop culture?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.