NEW! If you don't understand one of the words in this article,
just double-click it.
A window will open with a definition from CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature
doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:
Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.
August 15, 2006
IAC: Encouraging Data on Etravirine (TMC-125)
by Tim Horn
August 15, 2006 (AIDSmeds)—Researchers at the XVI International AIDS Conference in Toronto have reported 48-week results from a phase II clinical trial of etravirine (TMC-125), Tibotec's experimental non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI).
The new data, reviewed by Cal Cohen, MD, of the Community Research
Initiative of New England in Boston at a poster session on Tuesday,
indicate that etravirine may offer long-term effectiveness to patients
who have tried and failed other HIV treatments, including currently
approved NNRTIs.
The study (TMC125-C223) enrolled 199 HIV-positive patients who had failed regimens containing NNRTIs and protease inhibitors
in the past. The study volunteers were randomized to one of two
etravirine doses (400mg or 800mg twice-daily) plus an "optimized
background regimen" (OBR) consisting of available HIV medications.
These patients were compared to an "active control" group, in which
patients cobbled together the best possible regimen using approved HIV
medications.
By week 48, approximately 39 of the 40
(98%) patients in the active control group had discontinued their
selected treatment, mostly due to rebounding viral loads.
In both etravirine groups, rebounds in viral load were only seen in 9%
of the patients. Patients in the active control group remained on their
selected treatment regimen for an average of 18 weeks, compared to an
average of time on therapy of 48 weeks in the etravirine groups.
Dr.
Cohen's group also reported that 23% of patients in the 400mg
etravirine group and 22% of patients in the 800mg etravirine group had
viral loads below 50 after 48 weeks of treatment, compared to no
patients in the active control group. Approximately 31% of patients in
the 400mg etravirine group and 34% of patients in the 800mg etravirine
group had viral loads that were at least 1 log below their baseline
results, compared to only 8% in the active control group.
Patients with the fewest HIV mutations conferring resistance
to current NNRTIs – such as K103N and Y181C - had the most pronounced
reductions in viral load. For example, in the 800mg etravirine group,
patients with only one NNRTI mutation saw their viral loads reduced by
1.67 log by the end of the study, compared to a 0.54 log reduction in
patients with HIV containing three or more NNRTI mutations.
As for CD4 counts
(T cell counts), there was a 61 cell increase in the 800mg etravirine
group and a 58 cell increase in the 400mg group. In the active control
group, there was only a 13 cell increase.
Because most
patients in the active control group discontinued their selected
treatment relatively early in the trial, a true comparison of the side
effects isn't really possible. Looking only at patients in the
etravirine groups, approximately 22% experienced diarrhea, 20%
experienced some type of rash, 20% experienced injection-site reactions
(caused by administration of Fuzeon®),
and 20% experienced fever. Other reported side effects, occurring in
greater that 10% of patients on an etravrine-containing combination,
included fatigue, headache, and insomnia.
These data,
Dr. Cohen reported, are encouraging. The results of etravirine's larger
phase III clinical trials, which are being conducted to support the
anticipated 2007 approval of the drug, are eagerly anticipated.