September #174 : Judicial Prejudice and HIV

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents
 

Features

All Grown Up With HIV

Facing the Future of HIV Care

From the Editor

The Facts of Life

Feedback

Letters- September 2011

The POZ Q+A

Going the Distance

What You Need to Know

The First Lady (Finally) Mentions HIV/AIDS

15M by 2015

Health Care for People With HIV in Grave Danger

Dame Elizabeth Taylor’s Jewels to Be Sold at Christie’s

Having Sex With Albino People Does Not Prevent or Cure AIDS

India-EU Trade Deal Could Put Millions With HIV at Risk

We Hear You

Judicial Prejudice and HIV

What Matters to You

Finding True Love With HIV

Treatment News

Test-Tube Babies

More Access to Medicaid for People With HIV

Help for Prisoners

FDA Approves a New HIV Drug

They’re Putting Viagra in Condoms???

By the Numbers

GMHC Treatment Issues September 2011

Comfort Zone

Life, in Harmony

POZ Heroes

Kid Wonder

   
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

September 2011

Judicial Prejudice and HIV

During the past several years, we’ve seen a disturbing trend in the frequency and severity of legal cases that criminalize people with HIV. Criminalization backfires as a public health measure because it deepens stigma and makes people afraid to get tested and treated for the virus. Thirty-four states and two U.S. territories have statutes that criminalize HIV exposure and transmission, according to the Positive Justice Project, and at least 80 prosecutions for consensual sex, biting and spitting have occurred in the United States in the past two years alone. Many of those prosecutions were despite the fact that there was no transmission of HIV. (In some cases condoms were used—which meant there was little risk for HIV infection—and in the cases involving spitting or biting, there has never been a recorded case of HIV transmission through saliva.) Here, we share some of your recent comments on HIV criminalization.

Most of the egregious prosecutions of HIV-positive people are unconstitutional to begin with. The Nebraska law making autonomous bodily functions like sneezing or vomiting a felony for HIV-positive people is a case in point, as is the case of the woman sentenced to eight years for “failing to disclose,” despite two witnesses and a front-page newspaper article indicating otherwise. In these cases, the convictions are patent violations of basic constitutional principles regarding the evidence of guilt and could [lead to legal] appeals that could [end up in] the Supreme Court.—Jeton Ademaj, 
City and State Withheld

Last time I checked, it takes two people to have sex. The [HIV-negative] partner is just as responsible as the person who is HIV positive, because, in most cases, they have a choice to use a condom…. Also, the results from the recent National Institutes of Health HPTN 052 study show that [in heterosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples], if the HIV-positive partner is on antiretroviral treatment, there is only a 4 percent chance of HIV transmission—even if no condom is being used.
—Daniel Angelis, 
City and State Withheld

What are the repercussions for [HIV-positive] individuals who are with partners and knowingly infect them, and don’t care? I honestly think that this has to be addressed. Many people are having sex, unwittingly, with partners who are engaging in secretive and risky sexual behaviors. These people need  a voice in the conversation, but not the paranoid and insane voice that is permeating bad legislation.
—Liz Morten, City and State Withheld

Someone needs to do something to combat the ignorance that is putting young men in prison for a long time even though the transmission of the virus did not take place.  Having [safe] sex and still being put in prison? The people bringing these cases have a lot to answer for.
—Joel Jordan, Marshall, Texas

Visit POZ’s new criminalization page at poz.com/criminalization to find out what you need to know to stay safe and free.

Search: Criminalization, Positive Justice Project


Scroll down to comment on this story.

email print



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    Drew949
    South Orange County
    California


    juliar33
    brooklyn
    New York


    ernienyc
    Bronx
    New York


    josebos
    Boston strong
    Massachusetts
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Do you work with your doc to design your own treatment regimen?
Yes
No

Survey
PrEP Course

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.