POZ - African American Hub : News : Advocate Seth Berkley Responds to HIV Vaccine Critics

POZ African American / Black Hub
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
African American Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » News


 

February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007


emailrssprint

October 19, 2009

Advocate Seth Berkley Responds to HIV Vaccine Critics

The president and chief executive of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Seth Berkley, wrote an opinion piece in the October 19 New York Times in which he criticizes those who cast doubt on recent HIV vaccine successes.

Last month, researchers revealed that a two-part HIV vaccine tested on more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand reduced the risk of infection by more than 30 percent. However, just a few days later, researchers were briefed privately about a second type of analysis that showed the vaccine regimen, known as RV 144, to be less effective than originally reported, which fueled skepticism from researchers and media outlets. The second analysis also showed that chance—rather than the protective effect of RV 144—might have been the reason why fewer volunteers in the vaccinated group contracted HIV compared with the placebo group.

In the Times piece, Berkley writes that doubting the possibility of an HIV vaccine “would be a shame.”

He adds, “This illustrates why the controversy over statistical significance is exaggerated. Whether you consider the first or second analysis, the observed effect of the Thai candidates was either just above or below the level of statistical significance. Statisticians will tell you it is possible to observe an effect and have reason to think it’s real even if it’s not statistically significant. And if you think it’s real, you ought to examine it carefully.”

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

         


[Go to top]

Featured Video
Do you believe we can end AIDS? To find out how you can help, click here.
Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS


    acousticmat
    Oakland
    California


    UPPinAction
    New Brunswick
    New Jersey


    GeorgieBOOY
    Miami
    Florida


    jdog46948
    Detroit
    Michigan
Click here to join POZ Personals!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2012 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.