Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents


The Long Haul

Native Soul




The POZ Diabetes Diet Makeover

Quitting Time

Boosting Immunity

Caffeine Fix

Staph Memo

Same Sheets, Different Day

Consider the Alternative




Flunking Math

Test Drive

Stage Fright

The New 90210?

Post It!

Nobody’s Foo

Media Police

HIV 101

Boston Latex

Getting Graphic

Power Surge

Inside the Box

Diagnosis: Stigma




The NAPWA/TAEP HIV/AIDS Policy Report

Mailbox-March 2008

Editor's Letter-March 2008



Most Talked About

HIV: Behind the Music (47)

An HIV Doc's Dilemma (29)

Virtual Prevention: Fighting HIV Online (26)

Inmate Testing: Optional or Mandatory? (18)

Killer Gay Sex! (15)

Most Popular Lessons

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Shingles

The HIV Life Cycle

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)


NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.


emailrssprint

March 2008


Test Drive

by Nicole Joseph

The CDC vs. the states in routine HIV testing

In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that everyone ages 13 through 64 be routinely tested for HIV. Though the desire to encourage people to know their status has been widely supported, it has also raised concerns about abandoning written informed consent and counseling—and about the government’s ability to handle newly discovered infections.

A recent study in the online medical journal PLoS ONE further complicated the CDC’s plan—it found that many states have laws limiting routine testing. Some states require that certain topics be discussed with patients before testing; others still require written consent. “The CDC is a national presence in terms of public health policy,” the study’s lead author, Leslie Wolf, an associate professor at Georgia State University College of Law, told POZ. “But these testing policies are decided on a state-by-state basis.” The CDC says some states are aligning laws with the recommendations. (California removed its written consent stipulation after the PLoS ONE article was published.) Still, Wolf warns that discrepancies between state laws and the CDC might cause testing sites to unintentionally violate those laws.     

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(2-50 characters)

Email:

(will not show)

City:

(optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

         

[Go to top]
Get Started
Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Talk to Us
Weekly Poll
Question: Do you suffer from allergies?
Yes
No

Monthly Poll
Question: Why are women being diagnosed so late that they have progressed to AIDS by the time of their diagnosis?
Women are too busy taking care of other family members
Doctors aren't testing
Doctors are unaware that a woman's symptoms can differ from a man's
Fear of HIV stigma
Denial
Women's lack of empowerment

Surveys
How do you see America's place in the global AIDS epidemic?

Tell us your political opinions on HIV/AIDS

more surveys  
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy