January #31 : Barred and Dangerous

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues

Table of Contents

Michael Jeter Takes on Hollywood

Bastard Nation

The Eyes Have It?

Their Own Private Africa

Supreme Indecision

Come Together, Right Now

Over My Dead Body

What a Riot

All About Colleen

Barred and Dangerous

Second-Class Organs

Loaded News

Up All Night

When Irish Eyes Are Smiling

Do the White Thing

Go Fish

The Reconstruction Era

ICAAC: Pros and Cons

Simply Undetectable

One Singular Sensation

Mind Your ZZZs and Snooze

Ad Fib

Italian Yeast Fighter

Not Tonight, Honey

What Did I Do Right?


Miss Diagnosis

Cyber POZ: TPAN Alley

Let the Sunshine In

Lady Bunny

Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle


Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

email print

January 1998

Barred and Dangerous

Infected in jail, rejected in court

For the incarcerated, justice can be as rare as a decent meal. Michael Blucker was jailed in 1992 for burglary and auto theft; he was paroled five years later, allegedly a survivor of sexual slavery and multiple rapes that left him infected with HIV. But the former Illinois inmate found no relief when he accused Menard Correctional Center officials of not only allowing the crimes but transferring known rapists to his cell.

A federal jury rejected Blucker’s claims against five officials, and deadlocked on two others. Both sides agreed – after some debate – that he became infected while an inmate, but Big House attorneys argued that the act was consensual. The former prisoner, who asked for $1.5 million in damages, is seeking a second trial. "This decision will allow prison administrators to keep their heads buried in the sand as to the extent of sexual violence inside," said Jack Beck, an attorney at the legal Aid Society’s prisoners’ Rights Project. "It’s a virtual certainty that HIV transmission is occurring in prison due to rape." Sex assaults in the slammer are next to impossible to prove due to prisoners’ fear-driven reluctance to come forward, beck added. Aggravating matters is the policy nixing condom distribution – based on the official delusion that sex is prohibited among prisoners and therefore they never have it.

A Menard spokesperson spun the jury’s judgement as proof that present policies adequately protect prisoners, while Republican state legislators seized on the high-profile case to call for segregation of prisoners with HIV. But Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the ACLU Eastern Missouri, said, "That would only perpetuate harassment and increase stigma." It would also violate the law that prohibits public ID’ing of PWAs. The Illinois Department of Corrections recently instituted forced testing of prisoners.

Search: criminalization, jail, michael blucker

[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Did you participate in an event for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day 2016?


more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.