September #147 : Wedding Crashers - by Lucile Scott

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues

Table of Contents

The Castaways

Undress for Success

Stomaching Nausea

No Behind Left Behind

Hep C Drug to the Rescue?

Garlic Pill Warning

Mexicanos y HIV

Can Hypnosis Tame PN Pain?

Getting Out and Staying Healthy

Throwing the Book at Marijuana

Kidney News

Tribal Council

The Good Germs

Wedding Crashers

Running on Empty

The Freshman

Red-Carpet Ready


Please Do Stop His Music

The Incredible Bulk

M·A·C Attack

Birthday Girls

Editor's Letter-September 2008

Mailbox-September 2008


GMHC Treatment Issues-September 2008

Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle


Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

Scroll down to comment on this story.

email print

September 2008

Wedding Crashers

by Lucile Scott

Do same-sex marriages cut the risk of HIV transmission? And is that question offensive?

This May, same-sex marriage had a bit of a honeymoon. First, California’s Supreme Court struck down the state’s ban against such unions, becoming the second state high court, after that of Massachusetts, to do so. Thousands of California couples—from Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi to 85-year-olds who’d been living in non-legally recognized bliss for decades—rushed out for double-bride and double-groom cake toppers.

Then New York’s governor, David Paterson, decreed that all state agencies would follow a court ruling that ordered them to recognize out-of-state and international gay marriages performed in locations where they’re already legal, such as California, Canada, South Africa and Massachusetts. But should advocates of HIV prevention join gay-rights advocates in throwing rice?

The link between stereotypical, demonizing notions of gay sexual compulsivity, particularly gay male sexual compulsivity, and HIV transmission has long been noted and debated. It is a stereotype that gay advocates have often rebutted by arguing that marriage would ordain and encourage pure, old-fashioned fidelity, giving gay people a legally sanctioned reason to swear off the temptation of extracurricular, unprotected sex.

A Boston College study found that the opportunity to marry encourages gay couples to view their relationships as more “real,” increasing their commitment and the desire for a long-term mate. Yet this defense of marriage, which presumes that it could solve the “problem” of gay promiscuity, may reinforce the very stigma it means to combat.

It seems to us, the real debate over the link between gay marriage and the presumed lower risk of HIV transmission is this: If, as the no condoms/abstinence-only conventional wisdom seems to espouse, marriage is some kind of institutional prophylactic, then why deny same-sex couples the right to enter into it, when homosexual men have a higher HIV risk than heterosexuals?

And what, moreover, actually happens in terms of that HIV risk when same-sex partners do get the right to marry?  (Not to mention that heterosexual marriage, especially in the developing world, has been shown to increase HIV transmission risk, due to infidelity and the fact that married couples often do not use condoms.)

Why can’t the playing field, so to speak, be leveled regardless of orientation and risk?

Some gay-marriage advocates and opponents have contended that the recognition has more to do with winning legal benefits—such as health insurance and advancement from “second class citizen” status—than with restructuring the emotional terrain of commitment and “acceptable” sexual behavior and risk.

Yet it is the low self-esteem that springs from inequality that can spur people toward behaviors—sexual and otherwise—that can compromise their health and well-being. “[Banning gay marriage] is not an attempt to put others down,” says William J. Bennett on the Catholic Education Resource Center website. “It is simply an acknowledgement and celebration of our most precious social act.” Hmm, so gays would suck the preciousness out of it, huh?

Gay or straight, the key to not spreading HIV in any relationship is honesty and communication about sexual behavior and risk.

Studies in the locations where same-sex civil unions and marriages are legal hint that predefined gender norms and expectations in straight couples can disrupt a household. They report that same-sex couples are often more egalitarian than their straight counterparts—with work split more equally and the notion of a dominant partner de-emphasized. The studies indicate same-sex married partners are more likely to use humor and affection to keep arguments from exploding, whether discussing HIV or extramarital interests.
While it’s too early to tell exactly what, if anything, gay marriage will mean for HIV rates, all signs point to a positive effect.   


Search: same-sex marriage, prevention

Scroll down to comment on this story.


(will display; 2-50 characters)


(will NOT display)


(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules

Hide comments

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 2 (of 2 total)    

Straight& HIV+ woman, Peoria, 2008-09-07 19:36:27
I find same sex marriages fine.However I do not believe these people should be allowed to have children,as only a born woman or man can really give the right addvice to the child who is asking.Just because a gay man may think he knows the answer to a female based question.He really doesn't because he hasn't been there as a female himself.The same goes for gay women.No,I don't think getting married is away to prevent being infected with HIV/AIDS.

Young, Philadelphia, 2008-09-02 20:51:14
Interesting reading. However, another spin on this is, what if one or both partners are POZ, does this mean they are not entilted to enter into marriage?

comments 1 - 2 (of 2 total)    

[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Did you participate in an event for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day 2016?


more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.