Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » News & Views » Treatment News

Special Reports

Rallying Behind HIV Vaccine Research

The Mother of All Battles

Face and Butt, Heal Thyselves

» More

Most Talked About

An HIV Doc's Dilemma (38)

Virtual Prevention: Fighting HIV Online (26)

HIV-Positive Man Sentenced to 35 Years for Spitting (20)

Face and Butt, Heal Thyselves (15)

Lambda Legal Responds to HIV Spitting Conviction (15)

Most Popular Lessons

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Shingles

The HIV Life Cycle

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

10 Years Ago In POZ

More Treatment News

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
February 2006

emailrssprint

February 13, 2008

Acyclovir Doesn’t Reduce HIV Infection Risk in HSV-2-Positive People

by Tim Horn

The anti-herpes drug acyclovir did not reduce the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted HIV when given to men and women infected with herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2), according to the authors of a study reported last week at the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Boston.

Multiple studies indicate that people infected with HSV-2 are at increased risk of acquiring HIV, given that herpes sores allow HIV to easily enter the body and establish infection. There have also been studies suggesting that people coinfected with HIV and HSV-2 who use anti-herpes medications are potentially less likely to transmit HIV to their sex partners. The new research presented at CROI, however, will likely dampen the hope that these drugs can be used to reduce the risk of HIV infection among people with HSV-2.

The study, known as HPTN 039, is the largest clinical study ever conducted to examine herpes suppression as a possible means of reducing the risk of HIV transmission. The results were reported at CROI by Connie Celum, MD, of the University of Washington in Seattle, and her colleagues. 

HPTN 039 was designed to determine if acyclovir—a cheap, safe and widely available generic herpes treatment—could reduce an HSV-2-positive person’s risk of acquiring HIV infection. The clinical trial was conducted at nine sites in Peru, South Africa, the United States, Zambia and Zimbabwe, and involved 3,172 total HSV-2-infected volunteers, including heterosexual women as well as men who have sex with men. The women were enrolled at the three African study sites, and the men at the six study sites in Peru and the United States.

The participants received either 400 mg twice-daily dose of acyclovir tablets or placebo. Throughout the course of the study, volunteers were extensively counseled on how to avoid exposure to HIV and were supplied with condoms.

The researchers found no evidence that the standard acyclovir regimen prevents HIV infection among HSV-2 infected people. Specifically, there were 75 new infections (3.9 percent) among the 1,637 participants who received acyclovir, while there were 64 new cases (3.3 percent) among the 1,640 participants who received placebo.

“The difference in HIV rates in the acyclovir and placebo group is not statistically significant, indicating that when acyclovir is used twice daily at the 400 mg dose, the drug does not prevent HSV-2-infected individuals from becoming infected with HIV,” says Dr. Celum. “More research is needed to understand ways to reduce HIV susceptibility among persons with HSV-2.”

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(2-50 characters)

Email:

(will not show)

City:

(optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 1 (of 1 total)    

Mark Davies, New York, 2008-02-21 22:24:50
I see the statistics in this study but they don't show how HIV was contracted. They lead you to believe it is by a outbreak of HSV-2. If these people all had suppressed Herpes HIV must have been spread some other way, no? I feel it's a stretch to conclude from these findings what has been concluded. Thanks

comments 1 - 1 (of 1 total)    


[Go to top]

Get Started
Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Talk to Us
Weekly Poll
Question: Do you suffer from allergies?
Yes
No

Monthly Poll
Question: Why are women being diagnosed so late that they have progressed to AIDS by the time of their diagnosis?
Women are too busy taking care of other family members
Doctors aren't testing
Doctors are unaware that a woman's symptoms can differ from a man's
Fear of HIV stigma
Denial
Women's lack of empowerment

Surveys
How do you see America's place in the global AIDS epidemic?

Tell us your political opinions on HIV/AIDS

more surveys  
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy