Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Women's Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » Treatment News


 

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

emailrssprint

February 15, 2008

HIV Treatment Improves, but Doesn’t Restore, B Cells

Most types of B cells return to normal levels within 12 months after starting antiretroviral therapy, leading to a partial—but incomplete—recovery of the immune system, say researchers of a new study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Much attention has been paid to CD4+ T cells in HIV disease, as they are the cells preferentially infected and destroyed by the virus. B cells are another important type of immune system cell, responsible for manufacturing antibodies, which target and help overcome most infectious diseases. And just as HIV negatively impacts populations of CD4 cells, it also damages B cell populations.

Like most immune system cells, not all B cells are alike. When we are first exposed to disease-causing microorganisms, often as children, some of the B cells created to fight a specific germ become inactivated and live on as resting “memory” cells. When exposed to the same infection again in the future, these memory B cells wake up and quickly mount an effective immune response. The cells that go out and actively engage in fighting the disease are called “activated” B cells. When B cells are first created, in what is called a naive state, they can become either activated B cells or memory B cells.

In untreated HIV disease, the proportion of the different types of B cells becomes uneven. The numbers of naive and memory cells become significantly depleted. As with CD4 cells, when these naive and memory cells become dangerously low, the body no longer “remembers” how to fight certain diseases, and people can become ill with the diseases known as opportunistic infections. Because there are few naive cells, the body can’t create enough new memory and activated cells to fight off new diseases either.

The number of activated B cells, however, increases significantly in untreated HIV disease. However, these cells are often dysfunctional and prone to apoptosis—cellular suicide (preprogrammed cell death).

Susan Moir, PhD, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in Bethesda, Maryland, and her colleagues sought to determine whether antiretroviral therapy would cause the proportion of B cells to return to normal levels and thus signal a restoration of the immune system.

Moir’s team enrolled 29 HIV-positive people who were ready to start antiretroviral therapy. Eighty percent were men, and they were matched with 34 HIV-negative participants who served as a control group. Measurements of immune cells were taken at baseline—the start of the study—and at three, six and 12 months after the HIV-positive participants started antiretroviral thereapy.

Of the 29 HIV-positive participants, 24 ultimately had measurements of immune cells available from all time points. Moir’s team found that the number of B cells overall increased by the 12th month following the start of antiretroviral therapy. The percentage of the dysfunctional activated B cells dropped dramatically, while the percentage of naive and memory B cells increased, especially the naive cells.

Memory cells, however, only increased to 12 percent of the B cell population. This is significantly lower than the 40 percent seen in the HIV-negative participants.

The authors conclude that while antiretroviral therapy may help normalize immune regulation, it does not completely restore immune function. They question whether starting antiretrovirals earlier, before memory B cell populations become so depleted, may be warranted and encourage more research to understand the impact of earlier treatment.

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

         


[Go to top]


Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Blogs by HIV+ Women
Regan Ann Michelle Annette

Read the blogs
Woman of the Month
Beth Benne: Nursing HIV Awareness
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California. 


Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I recently met a guy who is negative. I did tell him about my status and he decided to kiss me anyway (we didn't go further than that). But a day later, he called and said that he actually had a mouth ulcer that time when we kissed and he was very worried. Asked if he can get the virus from me that way. For that moment, I felt so insulted and yet I felt so bad. It was my first time having a contact with a "negative" guy."

from Positive Women


Join the forums

Smart + Strong Network
POZ Magazine
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health Magazine
TuSalud Magazine
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
Also visit POZ on...
Facebook

MySpace

YouTube

 
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy