Treatment News : Updated: Revise Social Security HIV Disability Requirements Says Institute of Medicine

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Treatment News » September 2010

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

September 28, 2010

Updated: Revise Social Security HIV Disability Requirements Says Institute of Medicine

The following article, originally published September 21, has been revised to reflect clarifications from the lead author of the IOM report.

A new report issued by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on September 13 says the criteria used by the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) to gauge HIV-related disability is outdated and should be overhauled to include new qualifications based on CD4 cell counts and specific sets of medical conditions. The IOM recommendations—requested by SSA—will only apply to new Social Security disability applicants once the existing criteria are amended; current disability claimants will not be effected by the proposed changes.

The IOM recommendations, which have yet to be officially reviewed by SSA, reflect the fact that modern-day antiretroviral (ARV) therapy can often improve the health of HIV-positive people with low CD4 counts or a history of AIDS-related opportunistic infections and, in turn, effectively reduce the need for disability benefits. The report also stresses the need for disability benefits for people living with HIV experiencing certain non-AIDS-related complications and ARV treatment-related side effects that can lead to disability.

The HIV Infection Listings, established in 1993, are the criteria currently used to determine whether people living with HIV are disabled by their infection and eligible for benefits. For example, a person living with HIV and a history of employment may be eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)—and, with it, access to Medicare—once a serious AIDS-defining illness has been diangosed, such as Mycobacterium avium complex or cytomegalovirus. Other benefits, including Social Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid for people living with HIV who have limited employment histories, are also dependent on disability status as determined by SSA.

Since the Listings were created, the IOM report argues, HIV care has advanced and the disease has dramatically changed from a uniformly fatal condition to a potentially chronic manageable infection, in which CD4 cell recovery and a return to physical health—and ability to work—is an expected positive consequence of contemporary ARV treatment.  Conversely, a number of non-AIDS-related health complications are becoming increasingly prevalent among people living with HIV receiving ARV therapy—such as neurocognitive impairment, chronic kidney disease, osteoporosis and a number of treatment-associated side effects—many of which can cause disability and were not included in the original 1993 HIV Infection Listings.

To account for the more recent reality that opportunistic infections can be cured or prevented by ARV treatment and prophylaxis, the potential health consequences of ARV therapy and the increasing prevalence of conditions that can occur jointly with HIV infection, IOM is now recommending to SSA that people living with HIV meet one of the following criteria to qualify for disability benefits:

In short, the IOM committee recommends that SSA move away from a list of less common AIDS-defining opportunistic infections and focus on manifestations and disease states that are more likely to be associated with disability today.

In addition to IOM’s disability-defining criteria recommendations, it also stresses the importance of mandated, regular reassessments of a person’s disability status by the SSA. “Since antiretroviral treatment often allows clinical improvement over a period of one or two years,” the IOM report suggests, “the committee believes claimants allowed under such a listing should be reevaluated periodically for disability status. The committee believes three years would allow for a sustained response and is the maximum practical period for Social Security Administration (SSA) reassessment.”

For example, in a person living with HIV deemed disabled because of a CD4 count below 50 cells, “if the claimant’s CD4 count exceeds the minimum threshold and the claimant is not disabled according to other sublistings [after three years], he should no longer receive disability benefits. However, in the event that the CD4 count drops below 50 cells, his disability benefits should be reinstated.”

Only those diagnosed with fatal or severe HIV-associated conditions (see the second bullet point above) will be granted permanent, "compassionate" disability status and will not be required to undergo medical reassessments.

IOM notes that the proposed revisions to the Listings affect new HIV-positive SSDI and SSI applicants only and are not to be applied retroactively. "The protection of those with existing disability is a solid part of SSA," says Paul Volberding, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and a lead author of the IOM report. "SSA was clear that revisions are not allowed to withdraw  existing benefits." 

Aware that some community activists are concerned about the possiblity of medical reassessments for those currently receiving SSA benefits, along with the suggestion that revisions for new claimants will create a two-tier system for disability beneficiaries, Volberding urges participation in the SSA review, which will likely involving a public comment period. "Community advocates should be engaged in this process, as the IOM recommendations are only the start of a discussion, not the end by any means," he says.

Another concern among some community activists is that the the IOM report only addresses changes to SSDI and SSI qualification requirements—the committee sidesteps the important issue of access to care that, for thousands of people living with HIV, is tied to SSA disability status. At present, people living with HIV who are uninsured can access Medicare or Medicaid, once they have been deemed disabled by SSA. While the new recommendations may make it easier for some people living with HIV to qualify for these public health insurance programs, it is possible that the absence of list of serious opportunistic infections—some of which can occur at CD4 counts above 50—will hinder the ability of others to access health care when they need it. 

"Although the issues of … access to care [is] critical in the discussion of Social Security disability benefits," the IOM report authors write, "in-depth discussion of the means by which people receive treatment and medications was deemed outside the Committee’s scope." SSA, in turn, will be left to grapple with the issue of how to retain people in care and on ARV treatment if the criteria for disability benefits are changed, a task that will likely be made much more difficult in light of existing AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) waiting lists for uninsured or under-insured people living with HIV and other changes stemming from the recent passage of health care reform legislation. 

"We completely appreciate the linkage of disability to care access," says Volberding. "Now, one has to get an OI for easy access. The revisions we suggest would allow the many who are diagnosed with advanced stage disease but without an OI to gain access. The suggested changes would allow compassionate disability for those with still terrible complications  and would clarify the relationship between HIV Listings and the existing ones for problems now appreciated as HIV related like cardiovascular disease. 

"The whole combination of disability benefits with Ryan White and ADAP is a completely appropriate area for a community dialog," he adds, "but trying to ignore the difference between AIDS in 1993 and the situation today seems hard to hold too seriously."

Search: SSDI, SSA, social security, disability, Institute of Medicine, CD4 count


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Hide comments

Previous Comments:


  comments 1 - 15 (of 96 total)     next > >>

Jackson, , 2012-08-19 19:04:07
I consider this an attack on the AIDS community as a whole and should not be tolerated.

Adam, , 2012-02-02 22:59:37
Unless you are a doctor, you have absolutely no qualifications to say who should work and who shouldn't. Additionally, I have not been sexually active in the seven years I have had hiv and how dare anyone put me in a context with the people who ARE out spreading it around. AT Daniela Romo & Coinflip

Adam, , 2012-02-02 22:48:36
Anyone that would comment indicating that EVERY person with hiv can work and is out infecting other people is seriously uneducated, ignorant, and a complete MORON. Last time I checked I am a good person with a sense of right and wrong, who has HIV, is NOT sexually active and have my individuality in-tact as well as my own set of circumstances surrounding my illness. HOW DARE YOU.

Logan, , 2012-01-31 23:25:41
At Daniela Romo. Not all of us got HIV from having unprotected sex or using IV drugs. Nor we go spreading the disease. Be responsible with your comments. I would give ANYTHING to feel healthy again and go back to work and feel productive. "Your" tax dollars? I paid my taxes too, every year while I was able to work. I'm a single mom with a 10 y.o daughter that probably I will never see all grown up. Give thanks for your good health, Daniela. You've been blessed.

Hermit, , 2012-01-31 23:19:55
I was just diagnosed with AIDS. I haven't started treatment because I just got out of Intensive Care with Pneumocystic Pneumonia, Splenomegaly, Hepatic Hemangiomas and Hydronephrosis. Lots of pain on a daily basis. My CD4 is on 140. It's scary to know that they want to lower it down to 50. I'm on 140 and I'm dying. I was told to apply for disability but reading all this makes me even more scared. I have a 10 y/o daughter that I'll probably won't see grow up.

Daniela Romo, San Francisco, 2011-07-21 21:24:12
Honestly I think MOST HIV Poz people can work, a lot of them are hooking up for Unsafe sex in the internet, many want freebies for doing nothing and stay on gov paid housing and going to bath houses and we are paying for that? if they want free money go to the libraries or pick up trash and do some volunteer work to get your Gov-checks, STOP living off from our tax dollars and stop re infecting others. stop the bare back sex... wear a condom.

Kenneth, San Francisco, 2011-02-03 03:47:45
So they think that anyone with T-cells over 50 should go back to work... In this economy? Are they insane? Trying going back to work after being on disabilty with one medical problem after another and then convince someone to hire you after being on disability for 10 years... There are no jobs for healthy people now... Perfectly healthy people are going without work for y months, 9 months, over a year now... and still they keep looking...

msoftie, dallas, 2010-12-23 00:14:36
This is unfortunate, but those that voted for Obama wanted "Change"... now it's here. Progressives aka Socialists would like to reduce the economic burden of those with HIV. We are about to see some terrible times ahead, especially for people like us, who live financially trapped into this lifestyle of 'working the system'. Big Pharma greed still has not been subdued by our govt., and when they finally do control medication costs, it'll be too late for most of us unfortunately. RISE UP & ACT

Ms Christy, , 2010-11-20 19:37:03
I have been hiv+ for 27 total years and was disbaled in the mid 90's with some serious health issues. I went back, to work in 2000 on Ticket to Work Program- BIG MISTAKE! By 2009, I was receiving Medicare premiums of $2400 a year which I could not afford even when I was employed. I went to every medical advocate in my city and no one could help me get out of the loop hole I feel through. I went 1.5 years without seeing a DR and no viral loads or physicians care. Do not lose your benefits!

coinflip, Harrisburg, 2010-11-05 06:23:00
It's time to take the loafers off the dole. When this whole thing started it was pretty much a death sentence, now it is not. The ones that can work should work.

DAve, , 2010-11-05 00:13:12
I find this yet another attack on people affected with HIV/AIDS. People get SSDI for many reasons eg fibromyalgia, obesity, etc but HIV folks must meet certain lab parameters or suffer from certain diagnostic labels. HAART is not the panacea everyone thinks it is. Fatique, diarrhea, sleeplessness, depression, weakness, lipodystrophy are real issues and the medical establishment doesn't listen to us. This is a crime. Does anyone know a sympathetic MD is the NJ Pa area who can help me? Pleas

chas goggins, Memphis, 2010-11-04 21:25:37
My current health insurance will not pay for Antiretroviral therapy? I can not afford $$1761.00 a month. What should I do?

David, Nashville, 2010-11-04 20:49:51
I have been positive since 1983. I was diagnosed with full blown aids in 1991. I have been thru many illnesses and my t count ranges from 10-180 all the time. I went on SS and then gave it up to go back to work. In 2 yrs. I was back on it again. I'm against cutting these benefits.

V. Fields, Milwaukee, 2010-10-30 15:43:34
I think the criteria being presented for which one is considered disabled with HIV is insane. I think they should leave this one alone. Obviously they have no idea how our lives are affected. The fatique, loss of concentration, and sleep issues are only some of my problems...and my tcell count is undetectable. These "geniuses" are so smart that they are dumb.

melanie, richmond, 2010-10-27 19:42:55
i am an undetecyable hiv person whom since being diagnosed has been diagnosed with diabetes,neuropathy,high blood pressure,high cholesterol;chronic diareaha, and seceral other diseases and have been denied ssi i worked before all this and can no longer work i am still fighting to get my disability and my hiv is below detection due to meds i have several other things on that are not permitting me to work and still am fighting for it

comments 1 - 15 (of 96 total)     next > >>


[Go to top]


Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dave41
    Bethany
    Oklahoma


    newlife202
    JOLIET
    Illinois


    Sexynyrican
    Brooklyn
    New York


    albsur7436
    San Francisco
    California
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Will decriminalizing injection drug use help end the global HIV epidemic?
Yes
No

Survey
PrEP Course

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.