Treatment News : AIDS Activists Call on Public to Support New FDA HIV Drug Approval Policy

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Treatment News » February 2011

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

February 23, 2011

AIDS Activists Call on Public to Support New FDA HIV Drug Approval Policy

The AIDS Treatment Activists Coalition (ATAC) is asking people to sign on to a letter in support of a proposed U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policy that will hopefully make it easier for drugs to be approved for heavily treatment experienced people.

The new guidance under review at the FDA is aimed at helping companies overcome a significant hurdle in HIV drug development: proving that a new drug is effective given the potency of existing drugs.

New drugs with potential for treatment-experienced patients are typically pitted against a placebo, with both the experimental drug and placebo combined with background regimens consisting of approved drugs that may fight a person’s HIV. This study design worked relatively well in the past, because many people had fewer than two other active drugs in their background regimens and, in turn, it was easier to prove the benefits of a new drug compared with placebo in a relatively short period of time.

Today, given the range of potent treatment options, most background regimens studied in trials are highly effective. In turn, it can take many months to determine the efficacy of an experimental treatment, despite the fact that earlier studies not requiring background regimens suggest that the new agent works well against drug-resistant HIV.  

What’s more, many researchers believe it is unethical to use a background regimen that has been optimized to achieve maximal viral suppression. Doing so substantially increases the likelihood of rapid resistance to the new agent.  

“Demonstrating the superiority traditionally required by the agency to prove effectiveness is now virtually impossible without conducting trials in treatment-experienced patients whose virus is not fully suppressed,” explains Lynda Dee, from AIDS Action Baltimore, in her letter on behalf of ATAC.

The letter goes on to explain that “Vicriviroc, a once daily CCR5 inhibitor, and apricitabine…have recently failed to demonstrate the efficacy necessary for FDA approval even though both drugs would certainly have been a valuable addition for treatment experienced patients.”

That’s where the new guidance comes in. In the proposed trial design, the experimental drug would be given to people on top of their failing regimen for a week or two, just to measure how much it was able to reduce virus on its own. At the end of the initial trial period, people would add a new active background regimen, allowing researchers to assess the longer-term durability and safety of the experimental agent without placing people at undue risk of developing resistance to the new drug.

ATAC is also asking that the FDA shorten the duration of studies required to grant full agency approval of a new drug for heavily treatment-experienced people. Rather than granting accelerated approval after 24 weeks of study data, and then full approval after 48 weeks, ATAC is asking the FDA to begin granting full approval with only 24-week studies. The group believes that older studies have documented that rates of viral suppression at 24 weeks have always held up well enough over 48 weeks that the additional time under study is no longer necessary, though continuing post-approval safety would need to be explored.

“We firmly believe that this new paradigm will ensure ethical expedited trial design with lifesaving new drugs for treatment-experienced patients [who have] limited or no available options by providing a reasonable and prudent pathway in which to develop new ARV drugs in the HAART era,” Dee concludes.

To sign on in support of these new regulations, click here.

Search: FDA, treatment-experienced, policy, sign-on letter, ATAC, Lynda Dee, trial design


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]


Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dversescott
    Baltimore
    Maryland


    InDefaultOf
    Seattle
    Washington


    Fred9774
    Brooklyn
    New York


    humboman
    Baltimore
    Maryland
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.