Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Women's Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » Treatment News


 

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

emailrssprint

December 27, 2007

Viral Load During Pregnancy: Lower the Better

An undetectable viral load, continuation of HIV treatment throughout pregnancy and full-term delivery are associated with the lowest risk of mother-to-child HIV transmission, according to new data from the ANRS French Perinatal Cohort published in the January 11, 2008, issue of AIDS.

The study, conducted by Josiane Warzawski, MD and her Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) colleagues throughout France, enrolled 5,271 mother-child pairs with deliveries between 1997 and 2004. Overall, 67 (1.3 percent) infants born to HIV-positive women were infected with the virus.

Viral load, at the time of delivery, was found to be a major transmission risk factor. Among the 364 women who delivered with viral loads above 10,000 copies, the transmission rate was 6.6 percent, compared with a rate of 0.6 percent among the 2,856 mothers who delivered with viral loads below 400 copies. The transmission rate among mothers with viral loads less than 50 copies at the time of delivery was 0.4 percent.

Another key factor was the duration of HIV drug treatment during pregnancy. There were no transmissions among women who were receiving antiretroviral therapy when their pregnancy was first documented and remained on treatment. Among HIV-positive pregnant women who started treatment during the first or second trimester, the transmission rate was approximately 1 percent. And among those who started during the third trimester, the transmission rate was 3.6 percent. The authors noted that the five mothers who transmitted HIV with viral loads below 50 copies at the time of delivery started treatment late in their pregnancies, between weeks 32 and 33.

Infants born premature were also at a higher risk for infection. According to the INSERM report, the transmission rate was six times higher for babies born before 33 weeks (6.6 percent) than for full-term infants (1 percent).

Dr. Warzawski’s group concluded that the “most effective means available to obtain such a control of viral replication is the use of triple combination therapy. Furthermore, our findings strongly suggest that antiretroviral therapy should be started relatively early, at the latest by 28 weeks, to obtain maximum efficacy.”

NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 1 (of 1 total)    

san, bklyn, 2008-01-25 00:03:53
Yes those statistics are wondeful but where are the studies for men who want to have children with uninfected female and there viral load is undetectable. what percentage are they.

comments 1 - 1 (of 1 total)    


[Go to top]


Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Blogs by HIV+ Women
Regan Ann Michelle Annette

Read the blogs
Woman of the Month
Beth Benne: Nursing HIV Awareness
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California. 


Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I recently met a guy who is negative. I did tell him about my status and he decided to kiss me anyway (we didn't go further than that). But a day later, he called and said that he actually had a mouth ulcer that time when we kissed and he was very worried. Asked if he can get the virus from me that way. For that moment, I felt so insulted and yet I felt so bad. It was my first time having a contact with a "negative" guy."

from Positive Women


Join the forums

Smart + Strong Network
POZ Magazine
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health Magazine
TuSalud Magazine
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
Also visit POZ on...
Facebook

MySpace

YouTube

 
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy