People living with HIV who received computerized video risk-reduction counseling before following up with a live doctor had less unprotected sex and used fewer illicit drugs than those who did not, according to the authors of a study published April 23 in the online journal PLoS One.
Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends health care providers counsel their HIV-positive patients about safer sex practices and drug use, research has shown many doctors do not follow these suggestions. Reasons providers give for not conducting such discussions range from feeling uncomfortable with the topics to limited time with their patients during routine medical exams.
To test the effectiveness of prevention interventions conducted largely through computerized videos, Paul Gilbert, ScM, and his colleagues from the University of California, San Francisco, enrolled 476 people living with HIV who had reported substance use, or unprotected anal or vaginal sex. The study participants were recruited predominantly at HIV clinics and hospitals in or near San Francisco. Most of the volunteers were male. Approximately half were black, and half were men who have sex with men.
At the start of the study, the participants completed extensive assessments of their sexual histories and drug- and alcohol-taking behaviors. The assessments were completed again at two future intervals, each three months apart and always just before a regular doctor’s appointment. In addition, half the study volunteers were asked to participate in a virtual, computerized counseling session where a doctor, played by an actor, guided them through a series of discussions about unprotected sex and substance or alcohol use. After the intervention, participants received a personalized printed worksheet outlining their risks, and their health care providers received “cue sheets” with suggestions to encourage further discussion.
Gilbert’s team found that the group who participated in the computerized intervention reported 20 percent fewer unprotected sexual encounters six months later, compared with the group who did not receive the intervention. Recreational drug use also dropped significantly in the intervention group compared with the non-intervention group.
Because both participants and their health care providers responded positively to the intervention, and because the intervention proved successful at changing behavior, the authors conclude that computerized prevention efforts like theirs may be easily integrated into regular medical practice and could be a useful addition to standard HIV care.
NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.
Please click OK to confirm your comment and confirm you accept our posting rules. Note your message will be reviewed by our staff before going live.
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but
the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as
the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a
community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California.
Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I recently met a guy who is negative. I did tell him about my status and he decided to kiss me anyway (we didn't go further than that). But a day later, he called and said that he actually had a mouth ulcer that time when we kissed and he was very worried. Asked if he can get the virus from me that way. For that moment, I felt so insulted and yet I felt so bad. It was my first time having a contact with a "negative" guy."
