Treatment News : Poor Adherence, High Viral Loads Help Explain Rilpivirine Treatment Failures

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Treatment News » September 2010

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

September 16, 2010

Poor Adherence, High Viral Loads Help Explain Rilpivirine Treatment Failures

People who don’t adhere to their antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen, or who start treatment with a high viral load, are more likely to experience virologic failure on a regimen containing rilpivirine (TMC278) than people on a regimen containing Sustiva (efavirenz). These data—along with information on the drug resistant HIV strains that most commonly developed in people who experienced rilpivirine treatment failure—were reported September 14 at the 50th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) in Boston.

Rilpivirine is an experimental non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) being developed by Tibotec for people who have never taken ARV drugs. Rilpivirine is nearing U.S. food and drug administration (FDA) approval, and the company is actively working on a fixed-dose formulation that combines the drug in a single pill with Gilead’s Truvada (tenofovir plus emtricitabine).

Previous conference presentations of rilpivirine studies have revealed that the drug was more tolerable than Sustiva (efavirenz), the most widely used NNRTI in the United States. These studies also found, however, that people taking rilpivirine were a bit more likely to experience virologic failure than people taking Sustiva. Virologic failure was defined as: failing to get and keep virus levels under 50 copies on two consecutive viral load tests; having a 0.5 log increase in virus over the lowest ever measure; or having two consecutive viral loads over 50 copies after getting virus undetectable.

Explanations for Virologic Failure

To explore this pattern, Joseph Eron, MD, from the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, and his colleagues analyzed data from the ECHO and THRIVE studies, both of which compared rilpivirine with Sustiva in people new to ARV therapy, both paired with Truvada. As has been previously reported, rilpivirine was found to be comparable in efficacy to Sustiva, but with fewer side effects, particularly nervous system side effects.

In this analysis, Eron’s team found that rilpivirine takers were more vulnerable to virologic failure if they started with a high viral load or had adherence challenges along the way. Fortunately, the majority of people in both studies began therapy with a viral load under 100,000, and most had good adherence. In this group, where adherence was high and virus levels low, there was no difference in the rate of virologic failure between those on rilpivirine and Sustiva.

A difference began to emerge, however, in those with good adherence but high pre-treatment viral loads. While starting treatment with a high viral load made no difference in the rate of virologic failures in those taking Sustiva, it increased the likelihood of virologic failure by more than three times in those taking rilpivirine.

The difference between rilpivirine and Sustiva was more striking when adherence was taken into account, and this was true whether a person started treatment with a low or high viral load. In those with low viral loads, poor adherence led to twice as many virologic failures in those taking rilpivirine than in those taking Sustiva. In people with high viral loads, poor adherence made virologic failure three times more likely in those taking rilpivirine than in those taking Sustiva.

Patterns of Resistance

Another important issue is whether people had measurable drug resistance when they experience treatment failure. More resistance after treatment failure can decrease the list of available future treatment options.

Among those with virologic failure, about half as many people taking Sustiva had drug resistance to NNRTIs as those failing on rilpivirine. Among the NNRTI-resistant HIV strains analyzed, the most common among those failing Sustiva was the K103N mutation. This mutation, especially when found alone, doesn’t appear to seriously jeopardize future treatment with the second-line NNRTI treatment Intelence (etravirine).

Among those failing on rilpivirine, however, the most common NNRTI mutation was the E138K, a relatively rare mutation. However, roughly 23 percent of those failing on rilpivirine had at least three NNRTI mutations. Both scenarios can reduce the likelihood that a future regimen that contains Intelence will work.

Mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), such as the drugs contained in Truvada, were about twice as common in those failing rilpivirine than in those failing Sustiva.

Search: Rilpivirine, TMC278, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, NNRTI, Sustiva, efavirenz, Truvada, tenofovir, emtricitabine, Tibotec, Gilead, virologic failure, adherence, Joseph Eron, ICAAC


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]


Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    fokisi
    Long Beach
    California


    newlife202
    JOLIET
    Illinois


    latinpozdallas
    Dallas
    Texas


    jacob2608
    Panama City Beach
    Florida
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.