POZ - Treatment News : Following Treatment Guidelines Generates Best Results

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Treatment News » January 2008

What's That Mean?
(just double-click it!)

NEW! If you don't understand one of the words in this article, just double-click it. A window will open with a definition from mondofacto's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:


Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


email print

January 8, 2008

Following Treatment Guidelines Generates Best Results

HIV-positive women whose doctors followed federal treatment guidelines faired far better in terms of CD4 count and viral load than women whose doctors put them on treatment regimens that were not recommended or covered by those guidelines, say researchers of a study published in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

Jennifer Cocohoba, Pharm D, from the department of clinical pharmacy at the University of California San Francisco School of Pharmacy, and her colleagues analyzed the medical records of women enrolled in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). They found 217 HIV-positive women who started antiretroviral treatment between April 1998 and October 2004.

Cocohoba’s team separated the women into three categories. The first category included women whose doctors initiated antiretroviral treatment regimens that were listed as “preferred” or “alternative” according to the version of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) HIV treatment guidelines that was current at the time the women started treatment. The second category included women whose treatment regimen the DHHS guidelines specifically mentioned as not recommended. The third category of women included those who started a treatment regimen that was not listed in the guidelines at all.

The majority of women who took a recommended regimen were on a three-drug combination that included two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) plus one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), a triple NRTI combination or two NRTIs plus a protease inhibitor. Examples of treatment regimens that the guidelines recommended against included monotherapy (taking only one drug), dual therapy (taking only two drugs) or taking a combination of drugs that were known to have negative interactions. Examples of treatment regimens that were unlisted in the guidelines included four-drug combinations.

The results were resounding. Women who followed the guidelines gained an average of 181 CD4 cells the first two years after starting treatment. This compared with a 144 CD4 cell gain in women whose treatments were not listed in the guidelines, and only a 21 CD4 cell gain in women whose treatment the guidelines recommended against.

The trend in terms of viral load was similar. Sixty-one percent of women who followed the guidelines had an undetectable viral load two years after starting treatment, compared with 56 percent of women who started a treatment unlisted in the guidelines and just 33 percent of the women whose treatment regimen the guidelines recommended against.

The results of this study are highly significant, because only 53 percent of the women in this study received a treatment regimen that was recommended by the DHHS guidelines.


Scroll down to comment on this story.

email print

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 2 (of 2 total)    

pamela, palo alto, 2008-01-12 14:00:51
read this study carefully and one will see that the conclusion is simply that some used the meds and in the 'short term' had different results. this journalists has failed to report the conclusions accurately and leads the reader to believe erroneous outcomes.

jhunu, hyderabad, india, 2008-01-10 01:21:00
where was the study conducted, do you have any study reports conducted in indian context.

comments 1 - 2 (of 2 total)    


[Go to top]


Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV 101
HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
Disclosing Your Status
POZ TV
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Women
African American
Latino
Providers
Job Listings
Events Calendar
Starting Treatment
Quilt in the Capital
POZ Army


    ht2988
    Kalamazoo
    Michigan


    Sin_Grinder
    Genoa
    Nevada


    ToPherCE
    san diego
    California


    posattitude2011
    Williamstown,NJ
    New Jersey
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Talk to Us
Poll
Do you support rapid in-home HIV testing?
Yes
No

Survey
Health 2.0

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2012 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.