Treatment News : "Remarkable" Treatment Outcomes in Urban HIV Clinic

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Treatment News » August 2011

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

August 30, 2011

"Remarkable" Treatment Outcomes in Urban HIV Clinic

Very high rates of retention in care and undetectable viral loads are possible in U.S. clinics providing care for disenfranchised people living with HIV in urban centers, according to a new study and accompanying editorial published online ahead of print by Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID). The Johns Hopkins HIV Clinic cohort study’s findings are highly relevant for the HIV community, the editorial suggests, “because they show extremely high treatment success rates, even in the context of challenging sociodemographic circumstances.”

A landmark study highlighting discrepant outcomes between clinical trials and clinical practice was a retrospective review of 237 people receiving initial protease inhibitor–based treatment from 1996 to 1998 at Johns Hopkins, explains Paul Sax, MD, of Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital in his CID editorial. The cohort consisted predominantly of an inner-city, relatively poor and largely African-American population. Only 37 percent achieved undetectable viral loads one year after beginning therapy—about half the rate of treatment efficacy achieved in clinical trials using the same antiretroviral (ARV) agents.

“The results of this study were sobering and had a major impact on clinical practice,” Sax writes. “Providers were understandably leery of prescribing [ARV therapy] to patients who had such a low rate of treatment success, because virologic failure could select for HIV drug resistance mutations that both reduced future treatment options for the individual and, ominously, could be transmitted to others. The increased recognition of severe metabolic abnormalities and disfiguring body shape changes—sometimes correctly and sometimes incorrectly linked to [ARV treatment]—pushed the favored treatment strategy from a ‘hit early, hit hard’ approach to one in which clinicians could feel justified counseling patients to avoid starting therapy for as long as possible.”

The more recent results, reported by Richard Moore, MD, and John Bartlett, MD, involving the same cohort, are a “remarkable accomplishment,” the authors write.

Since 1996, Moore and Bartlett report, the proportion of people living with HIV being retained in care at the clinic has increased from 86 percent to 94 percent. The rate of those receiving ARV therapy has also increased, from 22 percent in 1996 to 85 percent in 2010.

While the average viral load among the clinic patients was 10,000 copies in 1996, it was below 200 in 2010. In fact, only 17 percent had viral loads above 500 in 2010, which included patients  both on and off ARV treatment.

CD4 counts were also much improved, increasing from an average of 239 in 1996 to 444 in 2010.

“We believe that our results emphasize that even in an inner urban HIV-infected population with a relatively high proportion of patients who were infected as a consequence of injection drug use, [ARV therapy] can be highly successful,” Moore and Bartlett conclude.

“One potential explanation for these extraordinary results is that Johns Hopkins has been a longstanding leader in HIV care and research, with a well-established multidisciplinary HIV program,” Sax writes. “Although the care given is undoubtedly excellent…it is important to emphasize that this improvement in outcomes is also occurring at other sites; the authors fully acknowledge that they cannot take full credit.”

Search: HIV, clinic, Johns Hopkins, urban, poor, IVDUs, outcomes, viral load, ARV, treatment, retention in care


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]


Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dversescott
    Baltimore
    Maryland


    slimcuteguy
    Asheville
    North Carolina


    Sexynyrican
    Brooklyn
    New York


    daino1972
    Columbus
    Ohio
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Are you a regular coffee drinker?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.