Happy anniversary, protease. So to speak. As year-plus after the
advent of protease inhibitors, many triple-drug takers are still in the
honeymoon stage, while others are wondering if this marriage can be
saved. The headlines out of ICAAC, the Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, in Toronto, Canada, last October:
"AIDS Drugs Failing." The media focused on a study by Dr. Stephen
Deeks, of University of California/San Francisco, showing that virus had
returned in 53 percent of his subjects who had initially gone
"undetectable." What this means remains to be seen, since Deeks, the
first to publicly deliver such depressing data, said, "All of our
‘failures’ are clinically feeling very well. It’s important to
understand we have no idea of the prognosis of people who have resistant
virus." POZ spotted some familiar faces in the crowd of 10,000 and asked for their take on the ICAAC highs and lows.
Dr. Stephen Deeks,
San Francisco General Hospital
"People with HIV should not depend on the mainstream press for
accurate information – the data we presented was sensationalized and
taken entirely out of context. It suggested that about half of our
patients on protease inhibitors had evidence of drug failure. But you
have to put these results in the proper context: We looked at the use of
these drugs back in 1996, and the patients we followed generally had
very advanced HIV and were heavily pre-treated with other
antiretrovirals. When we looked only at our patients who were moderately
healthy and changed at least one of their other drugs when initiating
protease inhibitors, the success rate was closer to 90 percent."
Kiyoshi Kuromiya,
Critical Path Project
"There was good news and bad news – but it will all help us refine
how to use this new class of drugs that are more effective than we ever
imagined three years ago. Sure, we don’t have all the answers on when to
start and stop therapy, or on cross-resistance or drug interactions. We
often blame patients for nonadherence in situations where there may be
drug resistance. But Combivir, the AZT/3TC combination, was approved –
and we’ll continue to see dosing improvements."
Dr. Paul Bellman,
St. Vincent’s Hospital, New York City
"It was a very positive conference. Contrary to the media reports, we learned that it’s not
inevitable that up to half of all patients will fail on
protease-inhibitor therapy. The results of the AZT/3TC/Crixivan trial
showed that the benefits lasted for 18 months and counting – and there
was no evidence that patients were breaking through and developing
resistance. Viracept in combination had similar results. Plus, new
information was presented on several new anti-HIV drugs like Sustiva, a
very important NNRTI that, when taken with Crixivan, produced
extraordinary viral load reductions in almost every patient treated over
a 24-week period."
Dave Gilden
GMHC’s Treatment Issues
"It is necessary to have undetectable viral load to become clinically
stable? Is going below 400 enough, or do you have to get as close as
possible to zero? These are hotly debated questions. Many doctors are
still prescribing two-drug combos to people on therapies with low viral
loads or are keeping people on therapies that only bring viral loads
down to several thousand on the theory that that is good enough for the
next several years – until we have more potent drugs and salvage
therapies for patients who develop drug-resistant HIV. Others want to
beat the virus down to zero. But Dr. Robert Silicano’s keynote address
here indicated that even after three years of successful highly active
antiretroviral therapy, there are still latently infected cells that can
produce new virions."
Dr. Cal Cohen,
CRI New England
"The tone was realistic and sober – it wasn’t the celebratory
Vancouver ‘Wow, we finally figured out the rules of the game.’ We’re
learning the rules and learning just how unforgiving the rules are,
too. It was very important because we faced not only our successes, but
also what we will do about our lack of success. In terms of protease
cross-resistance, the guidelines had been "Switch everything" – until
this meeting, where we saw just how that works. You don’t see as much
success as you want. When these regiments work, they work really well.
But there aren’t enough safety nets with current meds, so it’s a
tightrope. Therefore, ‘hit early, hit hard’ has to be toned down just a
little. It was a best-of-times, worst-of-times meeting."
Julie Davids,
Philadelphia FIGHT
"I was stressed that here was nothing about vaginal microbicides at a
microbiology conference. There was a lot of hype about vaccines,
though. It’s being constantly reinforced that people with HIV need an
HIV specialist to work out all of the details of their treatment with."
Spencer Cox,
Treatment Action Group
"The conference was a big snooze. The failures we’re seeing are in
heavily pre-treated patients, who we already knew were having problems.
When we look at patients with less pre-treatment, we see much better
results. What we’re hearing from the media is that people are suddenly
discovering that AIDS is not over, which anyone watching anti-HIV
therapy closely already knew."
Bill Bahlman,
ACT UP/New York
"There was a lot to get out of ICAAC, especially in terms of
understanding resistance. Most of the data pointed to trying to choose
the best possible first-line combination cocktail. It also suggested
that after you become resistant, your second-line defenses may not be as
successful as we had hoped. The great need for new types of
non-cross-resistant protease inhibitors and nukes was overwhelmingly
evident."
Jill Cadman,
GHMC’s Treatment Issues
"The information about how protease inhibitors are working in people
who have been heavily pre-treated was very important. Think of how many
were given AZT monotherapy – it is in this group that protease
inhibitors are least successful. These patients need individual
attention and a regimen tailored just for them. Although progress has
been made and there are eleven FDA-approved antivirals, we’re still
trying to learn how to combine them."