May 2, 2013
272 Days in Prison
by Kenneth Pinkela
A U.S. Army lieutenant colonel asks for an end to HIV prosecutions in the military.
The following is the text of a public comment by Lieutenant Colonel Kenneth A. R. Pinkela of the United States Army before the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) on Monday, April 22, 2013:
Good afternoon. My name is Kenneth Pinkela. I am a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and I have HIV. I am here today just three weeks after being released from an Army prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, after serving 272 days. I was not charged with infecting anyone, but with aggravated assault solely because of an accusation that I exposed someone to HIV.
I want to thank you—on behalf of my family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers, both civilian and military, all of whom have been affected by my prosecution—for having demonstrated such leadership with the passage of the criminalization resolution at your February meeting.
What did or did not happen, between me and the person who accused me, did not matter to the Army. Two things mattered: 1) I was accused, and 2) I have HIV. The prosecution’s case was focused almost solely on proving that I had HIV; the military court would not allow my counsel to introduce critical evidence, as well as physical and medical evidence.
The prosecutor said, and I am quoting directly here, “where there is smoke there is fire...you are HIV positive so it must have been you.”
Now I am a convicted felon and registered sex offender. My 26-year career of service and sacrifice to my Nation—including a stint as the Army’s legislative liaison to the U.S. House of Representatives—is gone.
No job. No retirement benefits. No access to medical care for either combat injuries I have suffered or other health needs, like treating HIV. Not even a flag for my coffin when I die. My ability to care for my family and our future is in jeopardy. My case is pending in the military appeals process, and we pray that that process will right this wrong. But the damage that has already been inflicted on my life, family, friends and reputation can never be corrected.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not have an HIV specific article or statute. But individual convening authorities and military prosecutors can and do use HIV as the reason to prosecute under other articles of the code.
The UCMJ is supposed to represent the will of Congress, and of the Commander in Chief, to provide for the good order, conduct and discipline of the Armed Forces. I hope you will join me in questioning whether this kind of prosecution truly represents the will of Congress, the Commander in Chief and of the nation?”
While I realize PACHA is an advisory council to the President, I am asking that you also use the power of your bully pulpit and send a letter and copy of your resolution directly to Secretary Sebelius and to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, urging their immediate attention to this injustice to those serving in the armed forces as well as to the nation.
I hope you will ask the President, my Commander in Chief, to stop these harmful prosecutions by executive order, prohibiting the use of HIV as justification for a prosecution, and protect the men and women in uniform who have HIV and serve their nation with honor everyday. I hope you will ask the Commander in Chief and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to review military prosecutions based on the HIV status of the person charged and, as is appropriate, consider executive clemency, pardon or sentence reconsideration.
I am committed to helping PACHA and Members of Congress like Congresswoman Barbara Lee continue to fight to develop and pass meaningful legislation that will help protect our Nation and not discriminate people based solely on having HIV.
Thank you for your time, and thank you for your service.
Kenneth A. R. Pinkela
Search: Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, PACHA, Army, Kenneth Pinkela, criminalization
Scroll down to comment on this story.
comments 1 - 15 (of 34 total) next
Mel Paris, Outerbanks-NC, 2013-12-29 17:40:20
It would be great in this day age of technology if you could create a website or blog to act as a patician, where we could instantly sign online and it would be sent to the different department heads along with the President.
H.Schurmann, Amsterdam, 2013-08-31 13:03:44
Stop these prosecutions, it's a shame!
Robert T. Jenkins, Chicago Met
So much injustice in the world, yet the military service of the United States of America is governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)--a code which allows prosecutions based on status, rather than actions. Should civilian stateside society be happy about the UCMJ-based PROSECUTIONS of STATUS, rather than actions? Battles must be fought--& not just on the battlefield
boomer212, DC/NYC, 2013-08-06 17:21:50
RE Ken's comments you have to ask yourself why then this even happened? what was the gain for the victim? obviously to me, as well as the military, you are guilty. making a decidedly poor choice and then blaming the victim is shameful. while i'm glad you served your time and now suffer consequences, it seems that this experience hasn't taught you to acknowledge your part. It's time to take responsibility, learn from this experience, and use protection next time you have sex, consensual or not.
Jeff, Washington, 2013-07-24 12:31:14
Thank you for your service to this country and for your bravery. I have hopes that blaming victims for a disease can end soon and that reason prevails.
Ralph, Providence, RI, 2013-07-21 08:31:15
Whether the accuser knew or did not know that the LTC was HIV+ (defense maintains that he was aware of the HIV status) it is up to each and every one of us to protect ourselves when having sex. This was not a case of rape, the accuser stated that it was consensual. IF a sexual act took place BOTH parties should have insisted that it was safe.
Duke, Phoenix, 2013-07-20 16:15:33
It took courage to share your story and I thank you Ken. Mostly due to fear, ignorance and prejudice, many do not understand the Socio-economic consequences HIV bring. I, Veteran,USA 1LT, lived 16 horrific years in complete silence because VA misdiagnosed me as HIV positive in 1992. Ironically, in 2008 while I was living in a homeless shelter, I learned through a different VA hospital that I am HIV negative. I would highly recommend more Veterans to come forward and share their stories. Thanks.
sakpoz, , 2013-07-19 12:12:27
Sir, thank you for your service. I too have been privy to the same type of discrimination as an AD Officer. I learned very quickly which ones where HIV phobic which they made very clear in the beginning. They made life difficult and there was nothing I could do. I too was blamed for things I didn't do but had no way to defend myself because "I was the one with HIV". I learned never to mention my status or date anyone because of the fear of someone else disclosing my status as a vengeance.
KEN, Arlington, 2013-07-17 07:31:01
First thank you to the many great comments.
Let me make it VERY CLEAR to the few negative comments.
1. I DID NOT TOUCH or have unprotected sex with the complaining witness
2. My ENTIRE family was in my home and testified in DETAIL but were called LIARS
3. There was NO investigation
4. The complaining witness testified and admitted under oath to 4 Federal Felonies including lying and Identity Theft
5. There was NO CASE if HIV was NOT in the equation
Daphne, , 2013-07-04 18:12:54
Mr LTC Kenneth,
First and foremost I would like to personally say thank you for serving our country. Second, it is a shame how the government treats those who have served. Regardless of whether or not you are HIV positive does not change the fact you served for our country. I think it is disgusting that a person can be discriminated against just because they carry a virus. No one who is HIV asks to be positive. I hope this battle you conquer for us all!
boomer212, nyc/dc, 2013-07-02 16:13:06
poz or not, he was WRONG and luckily convicted with that. If he was charged with passing HIV then he should be up on attempted murder but he wasn't. He's proudly walking the streets claiming HE'S the victim in all this, while disrespecting the Army he allegedly loves by posting pictures of him in uni. (Why hasn't he been discharged after his last TOD in a military prison?)Sad that aggressors can garner sympathy as a victim to their heinous crimes.
Krido, Baltimore, 2013-07-01 00:25:32
Oh my God. This is really sad. I can't believe that's its that easy to ruin a persons life work and future. I really don't know what can be said except please someone protect our people serving.
MAT STRAZZ, BOSTON MA USA, 2013-06-30 17:30:17
I feel bad that you have HIV, as I do. My understanding is that anybody with HIV, is unfit for duty. Unless the military has changed this. When you found out that you had HIV and informed your commander, they would have done a medical discharge. Military law is very different from civil law. The rules may be harsh, but work to change them. They can tell if you infected someone, by comparing the HIV strains in your body and his, they can tell who infected who or not.
JJO, Longview, 2013-06-28 15:16:28
Fear and ignorance are pervasive and its almost impossible to convince the scared people that you CAN have "unprotected" sex and still NOT transmit the virus. How is this accomplished? Well, I just exited a "sero-diverse" relationship of 10 years and my partner is still negative to this day. I always made certain I never climaxed inside of him. Its THAT simple. People are going to prison even if no infection has occurred (and that was with condom usage)..
Big Army, , 2013-06-25 11:10:27
comments 1 - 15 (of 34 total) next
Pinkela had unprotected sex and failed to disclose his POZ status. The lemmings repeat the "innocent until proven guilty" mantra, but completely ignoring the fact that he WAS proven guilty in court. You may want to shift the burden to his partner - "he should have asked" - but everyone is whitewashing over the fact that Pinkela shirked his OWN responsibility.
I suggest you all read the trial transcript before jumping blindly on the bandwagon.
And give some thought to the man he put at risk.
[Go to top]