POZ - Newsfeed : Another Peace Corps Volunteer Dismissed for Being HIV-Positive

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Newsfeed » May 2008

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

May 16, 2008

Another Peace Corps Volunteer Dismissed for Being HIV-Positive

In January, the Peace Corps dismissed volunteer Jeremiah S. Johnson, 25, after he tested HIV-positive during his service in the Ukraine. Along with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Johnson is working to bring legal action against the Peace Corps; at the time of his ouster, the corps stated that he was the first volunteer to be diagnosed with the virus. But in the May 16 edition of The Washington Post, reporter Stephen Barr reveals that of the 75,000 Americans who have joined the Peace Corps since 1989, 36 have tested positive either during or at the conclusion of their overseas tours (washingtonpost.com, 5/16).

According to the article, one of these volunteers, Rebecca M. Coulborn—who was serving in the sub-Saharan nation of Burkina Faso—was removed from service in 2001, within 48 hours of her diagnosis. “I was told that was Peace Corps policy,” she said. “If you did test HIV-positive, you were medically separated from the Peace Corps.”

The story notes that volunteers who develop any medical condition that cannot be resolved within 45 days are medically separated from the rest of the corps. However, in response to the outcry over Johnson’s removal, the Peace Corps says it will reevaluate its policy.

“The Peace Corps is now committed to extending the individualized assessments in these types of cases to include whether a newly infected volunteer could be reasonably accommodated and either kept at post or sent to another post in lieu of medical separation,” the organization wrote in a letter to the ACLU. “We cannot commit to a guarantee of reassignment.”

Search: Peace Corps, Jeremiah S. Johnson, Rebecca M. Coulborn


Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailprint

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 3 (of 3 total)    

Andrew Scott, Bronx, 2008-05-23 08:25:10
Poz obviously does not understand much about the conditions in countries where the Peace Corps sends volunteers. When I served in West Africa 20 years ago I cam does with all kinds of tropical illnesses including hook worm, round work, tape worm, Amoebic dysentery, and malaria (on almost a monthly basis)to name a few. The medical care was was basic. In a place like Burkina Faso there are few facilities if any to do blood tests that would be routine in the US.

Mary Mutale, Lusaka, 2008-05-21 06:25:22
It is dissappointing for an Organ like Peace Corps to put up such discriminatory rules. HIV is not a disease but a condition which can be monitored and controlled. It is a shame on this Organ, I thought such Organs are suppose to uphold human rights and live to promote human diginity. Such Organs are not even supposed to be in existence because they tend to frustrate, humiliate, and above all bring down people's calling to render services to others despite their health status -shame on you.

Michael, , 2008-05-20 22:01:32
I would hope that they would review their policy. They also need more and better education on the HIV diease, and learn to be thankful that those who test positive would still want to volunteer their time to help their organization out. They should only let those go if they asked to be released from any contract they might have signed up for.

comments 1 - 3 (of 3 total)    


[Go to top]


Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV 101
HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
Disclosing Your Status
POZ TV
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Women
African American
Latino
Providers
Job Listings
Events Calendar
Starting Treatment
Quilt in the Capital
POZ Army


    fokisi
    Orlando
    Florida


    RyGuy00
    Deerfield Beach
    Florida


    racine
    New York
    New York


    daino1972
    Columbus
    Ohio
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Talk to Us
Poll
Do you support rapid in-home HIV testing?
Yes
No

Survey
Health 2.0

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2012 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.