Newsfeed : Recycling Patient Blood Could Make a Comeback in Surgery

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Newsfeed » May 2014

Most Popular Links
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

15 Years Ago In POZ


More News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailprint

May 16, 2014

Recycling Patient Blood Could Make a Comeback in Surgery

Recycling a person’s blood back into his or her body during surgery—a practice made popular in the 1980s, when the risk of transmitting HIV and hepatitis via donated blood was far higher—could make a comeback, The Washington Post reports.

That’s because a new study from Johns Hopkins University, published in the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia, has found that the practice could actually yield better and cheaper recoveries for post-op patients than using donated blood.

The new research supports the findings of five other large studies, which have shown that people receiving their own fresh blood during surgery rather than blood from storage banks were less likely, or at least no more likely, to experience a heart attack, stroke, death or infection after surgery.

At Johns Hopkins, researchers divided 32 surgery patients into three groups to compare their recovery outcomes. One group got only recycled blood from their own bodies; the second received mostly recycled blood supplemented with a small amount of banked blood; the last group got a larger amount of stored blood along with some of their own recycled blood.

Scientists found that the patient groups receiving banked blood did worse. They also found that the cell membranes of the banked blood had seemingly hardened during the time it spent on hospital shelves, making the cells unable to squeeze through the body’s smallest capillaries to deliver oxygen to its tissues.

Researchers also noted that banked blood was more expensive, costing around $240 per unit. Recycled blood, however, cost only $120 for its initial equipment set-up, then virtually nothing after that.

To read the article, click here.

Search: recycled blood, donated blood, Johns Hopkins, HIV, hepatitis, transfusion, cost


Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

 
[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    aqua_31206
    Macon
    Georgia


    usuallyhappy
    Palm Springs
    California


    Deelight4u
    BROOKLYN
    New York


    humboman
    Baltimore
    Maryland
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.