POZ - News : Canadian Government Thwarts AIDS Prevention?
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » News » May 2008

Web Exclusives

Fight Club: Reflections on Mexico City

More Than Medicine?

AIDSmeds in Mexico: Notes From the XVII International AIDS Conference

» More

Most Talked About

Does Undetectable Equal Uninfectious? (21)

Just Found Out? A POZ.com Guide for HIV Rookies (11)

The Blood of Christ (a powerful one-man AIDS protest) (Blog) (9)

The State of AIDS in Puerto Rico (9)

Rethinking Criminalization of HIV (8)

Life Expectancy With HIV Increases Dramatically (6)

What's That Mean?
(just double-click it!)

NEW! If you don't understand one of the words in this article, just double-click it. A window will open with a definition from CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:


Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Herpes Simplex Virus

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

Shingles

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

10 Years Ago In POZ


More News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailrssprint

May 2, 2008

Canadian Government Thwarts AIDS Prevention?

An article published in the International Journal of Drug Policy claims the Canadian government interfered with research at a Vancouver safe-injection site and committed a “serious breach of international scientific standards” after a 2006 independent scientific review of the facility, The Globe and Mail reports (theglobeandmail.com, 5/2).

According to The Globe and Mail, the journal article accuses the government of misrepresenting the facility’s research findings because it is “ideologically opposed to harm-reduction programs.”

The facility—called Insite—was approved for funding by the federal government in 2003 to allow intravenous drug users access to emergency medical care, which could reduce their risk of contracting HIV. Since then, 22 peer-reviewed papers have cited the facility’s positive influence on that community.

However, federal Health Minister Tony Clement attempted to halt research, which would have led to increased funding for the facility and the launch of similar programs in other cities. A spokesperson for Clement denies these charges.

Research scientist and lead author of the study Evan Wood told The Globe and Mail that the government’s misrepresentation of research findings was political, and not in the interest of public health policy.

Search: Vancouver, needle exchange, Tony Clement


Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint


Name: (2-50 characters)
Email: (will not show)
City: (optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

         


[Go to top]

Get Started
Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Talk to Us
Weekly Poll
Question: Should it be mandatory for couples to receive HIV tests before getting married?
Yes
No

Monthly Poll
Question: Is the Latino community excluded  from conversations about the domestic AIDS crisis?
Yes
No

Surveys
Tell us about your pets.

Do you use social-networking sites?

more surveys  
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy