Treatment News : A Second Baby Born With HIV Is Now Apparently HIV Negative

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join

Back to home » Treatment News » March 2014

Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle


Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV

20 Years Ago In POZ

More Treatment News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to


March 5, 2014

A Second Baby Born With HIV Is Now Apparently HIV Negative

CROI 2014The famed “Mississippi Baby” has a sister: A second baby born with HIV now has no evidence of the virus in her body following an aggressive antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen given shortly after birth, The New York Times reports. Results from the case of this child, born in Long Beach, California, were presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Boston.

The Long Beach case should temper skepticism that the Mississippi child’s apparent functional cure was a one-off, or that the child in that case was not actually infected to begin with. (The Mississippi baby is now 3 years old and still apparently HIV-free and not taking ARVs.) Both viral DNA and RNA were detected in the second child’s spinal fluid, indicating that she was “definitely infected,” in the words of Deborah Persaud, MD, of Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, who participated in the cases of both infants.

Just as in the Mississippi case, the Long Beach baby was born to an HIV-positive mother who had not taken ARVs to prevent transmission of the virus to her child during her pregnancy. In an attempt to replicate the success of the Mississippi baby, pediatricians at Miller Children’s Hospital in Long Beach immediately gave the infant atypically high doses of Zidovudine (AZT), Lamivudine (3TC) and Viramune (nevirapine).

Highly sensitive tests cannot detect the presence of HIV in the child, who is now 9 months old. She is still taking ARVs, so she cannot, however, be qualified as functionally cured or in viral remission. Instead, she is considered “sero-reverted to HIV negative” at this time.

To read the Times story, click here.

Search: Mississippi baby, functional cure, viral remission, sero-reverted, HIV negative, HIV, baby, infant, child, The New York Times, Long Beach, Deborah Persaud, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, CROI.

Scroll down to comment on this story.


(will display; 2-50 characters)


(will NOT display)


(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules

Show comments (0 total)

[Go to top]

Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr Instagram
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar
POZ on Twitter

Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Has a pet helped you deal with your HIV?


more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.