POZ uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience, analyze our traffic and personalize ads. Our Privacy Policy
POZ uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience, analyze our traffic and personalize ads. By remaining on our website, you indicate your consent to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Usage.
Richard
The final point seems paramount. If the study didn't link infection rates to whether study subjects were receptive or insertive, the comparison with heterosexual experience in Africa is apples v. oranges. Circumcision seems to affect infectivity in the active, insertive partner, and wouldn't be expected to lower risk in the receptive partner.
October 16, 2008 • Rockville