Dear Secretary Clinton & Everyone Else,
Yesterday a whole lot of anger and hurt came into fruition behind your statement:
and subsequent apology:
My issue with you and EVERYONE else, is that no one is taking the opportunity to address the present issues surrounding HIV. The language alone is stunning. It is 2016 and the majority of folks today (including myself) don’t have AIDS, we are living with HIV! The two are not synonymous and yes it is important that we respect the past and how we got here because of science, disruption, and protest.
“In the early days of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the Reagan Administration was rife with homophobic staff who treated the burgeoning crisis as the source of humor during daily press briefings and snickers between men who had no empathy for the individuals facing imminent death. In 1983, Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, established an Executive Task Force on AIDS to monitor and manage the issue politically--excluding Surgeon General Everett Koop from attending and instructed journalists not to ask Surgeon General Koop about AIDS. In the summer of 1985 Rock Hudson died in Paris after his people reached out to his friends, Nancy and Ronald Reagan to get into a French hospital where he could access experimental medicines. He was denied. Mrs. Reagan worried that if she started doing favors for ’friends’ she might be overwhelmed. In February 1986, President Reagan asked Koop to write the first report on AIDS released October 22, 1986. In May of 1988, Surgeon General Koop sent a condensed version of his AIDS report in a letter to every U.S. household, making it the largest government mailing in our history and the only one to this day that has ever contained that level of explicit sexual information. There was a record, largely framed by fear, inaction, homophobia, hatred, ignorance, and death. There were bright moments amidst the terror, like the heroic work done at the CDC and NIH, but Hillary Clinton’s misstatement today (she has corrected the record) about the Reagan’s efforts on behalf of HIV/AIDS brought it all back to me. We MUST remember--accurately.” - Ernest Hopkins
I wrote a piece recently called #RealTalk: Nothing About Us Without Us - The Black Community & HIV. In it I spoke about the Denver Principles and leadership among those living with HIV. I made the observations that:
"1. As a person living with HIV, I have come to quickly learn that many, if not all organizations that
have anything to do with HIV & AIDS in existence do not have people with the lived experiences of being HIV positive on their boards.
2. There is only a focus on MSM or Men who have Sex with Men in their work of getting to ZERO. Many of the the coordinators, prevention specialists, and others who work on the community level are not in management and are Black. There are very few Black persons in upper management when it comes to organizations that provide care, on top of that, the ones (not all) who are in high level positions tend to come off as elitist and out of touch.
3. The lack of education in the heterosexual, BISEXUAL and TRANS communities. Straight Black women and men are at peril - especially women. IF we are to truly get to ZERO in the black community why are we ONLY focusing on Gay black men.
4. If our community organizations like churches and leaders won’t (address these issues), why can’t we table in the areas ourselves? When will there be a movement to hold the federal government to the fire to create a tracking system that is more holistic and respectful to the Trans community? After all, why keep counting Transwomen as men, while ignoring Transmen completely?"
“Nothing About Us Without Us!” (Latin: “Nihil de nobis, sine nobis”) is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members of the group(s) affected by that policy. This involves national, ethnic, disability-based, or other groups that are often thought to be marginalized from political, social, and economic opportunities."
The reason I bring this up is because I don’t hear or haven’t read about anyone talking to folks LIVING with HIV, all I see is you all rattling sabers about whether you like Sec. Clinton or Sen. Sanders better. Where is the conversation about HIV and how we can de-stigmatize, educate & grow from our conversations? I admittedly support you Sec. Clinton, but I refuse to defend you on this issue and I refuse to accept your apology. I also reject the notion that because I support you that I cannot be angry about this. In truth there are those who will say it was a speechwriter among other defenses on your behalf. I am waiting for and demanding that a continuous conversation be had, that includes you Sec. Clinton and other candidates on the local and national stage about HIV, but lead by folks LIVING WITH HIV.
Many of you have lots to say, taking this opportunity to attack Sec. Clinton and I am angry with you all, especially those of you who don’t have the HIV lived experience. I am angry because you all aren’t talking about HIV. You are right to question Sec. Clinton’s statement for sure and I love that, but the lack of conversation about HIV IS JUST OUT OF LINE. I am calling on you all to become more supportive while measuring cocks about your candidates.
This projection states that “If current HIV diagnoses rates persist, about 1 in 2 black men who have sex with men (MSM) and 1 in 4 Latino MSM in the United States will be diagnosed with HIV during their lifetime, according to a new analysis by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).” This projection is problematic just like how the events of yesterday are being handled. The idea that “African American men overall are almost 7 times more likely than white men to be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetimes. The disparity among women is even greater: 1 in 48 African American women will be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetimes, compared with 1 in 227 Hispanic women and 1 in 880 white women....” should scare you shitless, not for your life, but that more is not being done to stop this epidemic. If Black Lives Matter then Black HIV positive lives, and HIV lives over all damn sure matter!
Originally posted on the Strength In Numbers Blog: http://ashtonpwoods.strengthinnumbershouston.com/2016/03/realtalk-open-letter-to-hillary-clinton.html
Information you should know:
HIV - stands for human immunodeficiency virus. It is the virus that can lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or AIDS. Unlike some other viruses, the human body cannot get rid of HIV. That means that once you have HIV, you have it for life.
AIDS - HIV disease becomes AIDS when your immune system is seriously damaged. If you have less than 200 CD4+ cells or if your CD4 percentage is less than 14%, you have AIDS.
TRANSMISSION - Only certain fluids—blood, semen (cum), pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum), rectal fluids, vaginal fluids, and breast milk—from an HIV-infected person can transmit HIV. These fluids must come in contact with a mucous membrane or damaged tissue or be directly injected into the bloodstream (from a needle or syringe) for transmission to possibly occur. Mucous membranes can be found inside the rectum, the vagina, the opening of the penis, and the mouth.
In the United States, HIV is spread mainly by
Having sex with someone who has HIV. In general:
- Anal sex is the highest-risk sexual behavior. Receptive anal sex (bottoming) is riskier than insertive anal sex (topping).
- Vaginal sex is the second highest-risk sexual behavior.
- Having multiple sex partners or having other sexually transmitted infections can increase the risk of infection through sex.
Sharing needles, syringes, rinse water, or other equipment (works) used to prepare injection drugs with someone who has HIV.
- Seroconversion is the period of time during which HIV antibodies develop and become detectable.
- Seroconversion generally takes place within a few weeks of initial infection.
- It is often, but not always, accompanied by flu-like symptoms including fever, rash, muscle aches and swollen lymph nodes. These symptoms are not a reliable way to identify seroconversion or to diagnose HIV infection.