July/August #181 : Lawsuits Against Two Eateries Are a Whopper of a Story - by Lauren Tuck

POZ - Health, Life and HIV
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » Archives » POZ Magazine issues




Table of Contents
 

Features

How Congress Can Cure AIDS

Rolling in the Deep

From the Editor

AIDS Apartheid

Feedback

Letters- July/August 2012

The POZ Q+A

The Cure Hunter

What You Need to Know

Keeping HIV at Bay in Cuba?

Lawsuits Against Two Eateries Are a Whopper of a Story

Schools Across the Globe Deserve Dunce Caps for HIV Discrimination

Helping the Playas Play Safe

We Believe in Magic

We Hear You

Dealing With Discrimination in the Workplace

POZ Survey Says

Do Pills Equal Pleasure?

What Matters to You

LGBT Rights

Treatment News

How Poverty Helps Spread HIV

Altering Cells Might Boost HIV Control

Triple Crown Win for HIV?

Trauma Center

Comfort Zone

Life Support

POZ Heroes

An Army of Heroes

   
Most Popular Lessons

The HIV Life Cycle

Shingles

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

What is AIDS & HIV?

Hepatitis & HIV


email print

July / August 2012

Lawsuits Against Two Eateries Are a Whopper of a Story

by Lauren Tuck

Los Angeles restaurant The Ivy is known for its fried chicken, crab cakes, chocolate chip cookies—and a white picket fence that blocks paparazzi from snapping shots of celebrities who frequent the hot spot. Apparently the eatery’s custom of protecting the rich and famous may not extend to its own workers. The Ivy is facing a wrongful termination suit for allegedly firing an employee because he has HIV. 

Across the country in Virginia, Burger King (the antithesis of The Ivy) was slapped with a similar suit for letting go of a regional manager allegedly after he disclosed to his boss he was recently diagnosed with HIV.

Both plaintiffs are Latino men, a demographic disproportionately affected by HIV, and are being defended by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF).

Bottom line: Firing an employee because of his or her HIV status is unlawful—and unnecessary. If the allegations prove to be true, it leaves a bad taste in our mouth.

Search: Los Angeles, Virginia, The Ivy, Burger King, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, MALDEF

Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (2 total)

 
[Go to top]

Join POZ Facebook Twitter Google+ MySpace YouTube Tumblr Flickr
Quick Links
Current Issue

HIV Testing
Safer Sex
Find a Date
Newly Diagnosed
HIV 101
Disclosing Your Status
Starting Treatment
Help Paying for Meds
Search for the Cure
POZ Stories
POZ Opinion
POZ Exclusives
Read the Blogs
Visit the Forums
Job Listings
Events Calendar


    dlw8585
    Fort Lauderdale
    Florida


    mtaj0818
    Washington
    DC


    Heartland4now
    Tacoma
    Washington


    humboman
    Baltimore
    Maryland
Click here to join POZ Personals!
Ask POZ Pharmacist

Talk to Us
Poll
Have you ever been tested for hepatitis C?
Yes
No

Survey
Pop Watch

more surveys
Contact Us
We welcome your comments!
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertising policy | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.