Write a Comment

John

Why would she have umprotected sex knowing he was positive. Something smells about this one. What is she really doing going public with it.

February 27, 2009 • Maryland

Lee

Does this mean his baseball card won't be worth as much.

February 23, 2009 • San Diego

Rebecca

I don't want to judge either party until more facts come to light. She could be a money grubbing parasite or he could also be an egomaniac sex freak. I am sure the media will let it all hang out when as soon as they can.

February 17, 2009 • Rural america, trapped

Rebecca

Regardless of the money or lawsuit, as a PLWA, I hope for our reputation and for the love and respect we must learn to have for each other that this fella is truthful and did not knowingly have unprotected sex. If you don't know, GO HAVE A TEST AND TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR BODY.

February 17, 2009 • Rural america, trapped

Tom

How did he expose her children to the virus, as she claims? Did he have sex with them? Score one more for ignorance.

February 17, 2009 • Charlotte, NC

Positive in Ventura

Please be real lady. If he is positive how do you think he exposed your kids? get real and educate yourself unless he is having sex with your kids or sharing needles or razors and toothbrushes your kids are fine..... if he does have virus, if he did know and not tell you and had unprotected sex and if YOU are positive then you have a case otherwise no case and you are out for money.

February 13, 2009 • Ventura California

Richard

I feel that the girl choose to have unsafe sex with Met baseball guy to just get money from him.

February 12, 2009 • Piedmont

Michael

I really think this is terrible. She knew before having the unprotected sex that he had HIV. She also needs serious education on the diease because her kids were not at risk for getting the virus just because they lived in the same household as he did. I hope in this case, the Judge dismisses the case.

February 12, 2009 • Haslett, MI