Advertisement
<< Back To Article
Settlement Reached in AIDS Denialist Case

Write a Comment

I have read and agree to the terms and conditions in the Posting Rules*

8 Comments

Robert

Oh, and just for the record, I'm a firm believer in Western Medicine and I too am living proof that meds make a huge difference. My CD4 went over 500 for the first time in about 2 years and my VL remains undetectable and I know it's because of the meds. I guess I'm just playing the devil's advocate here. Do I think their denial has any merit, none whatsoever, but I do believe they have the right to believe what they want to believe and they lawfully made a choice for their daughter.

March 22, 2009 Chicago

Robert

I agree and believe that HIV is the virus that can beat our immune systems down to the point of succumbing to some AIDS related OI, but right or wrong, we have a choice in this country. I know this isn't a religious matter as with certain sects and medical care, but I had a friend pass away because he didn't believe(or want to believe)that HIV was at the root of this pandemic and instead grew mushrooms in the back of his closet that was going to cure him. Hey, it was his choice.

March 22, 2009 Chicago

Ben

I have been HIV+ since 1987, 22 years, without any type of OI. I am on Kaletra monotherapy, PCR below 75, CD4 over 800. No idea where I would be if I had not started therapy in 1990 with AZT (Zidovudine). I believe HIV is the precursor to AIDS.

March 10, 2009 Daytona Beach, FL

Connie

I can't believe that anyone would give these fruits any money for killing their child! This just makes these types of people stronger in their convictions. I know from personal experience tested positive for HIV in 86 Diagnosed with AIDS in 92 and two months after starting HAART was given less than 6 months to live. My life was one huge illness and constant IV's. Meds saved my life (literally) and today I am happy to have an immune system that is in Normal range!

March 10, 2009

Steve Kerbow

This sounds exactly like a CSI NY episode (repeat) that I saw last night. How tragic for the three year old daughter.

March 10, 2009 Houston TX

Donald Baxter

It's too bad that denialists have been allowed to sap the public till in this lawsuit; I just hope they didn't extort too much money--it's often just easier and financially prudent to settle rather than defend.

March 10, 2009 Iowa City

David

This case is profoundly sad and disturbing. Either the child died of pneumonia or she did not. She died of an allergic reaction or she did not. This is basic medical science. And who is the father going to sue now that his wife is dead?

March 10, 2009 Atlanta

douglas houghton

Those people are (were) sick in the head; their actions constitute child abuse. As the non-biological "parent" of a healthy 17 year old HIV positive child (on HAART) and as a health care professional, I am well aware of the benefits of appropriate therapy. Denying science does not make it go away. Giving one penny of public money to such crazies is a travesty.

March 9, 2009 miami beach florida

Advertisement

Hot topics


POZ uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience, analyze our traffic and personalize ads. Our Privacy Policy

Manage

POZ uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience, analyze our traffic and personalize ads. By remaining on our website, you indicate your consent to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Usage.